hadoop-yarn-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sangjin Lee <sj...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] merging YARN-2928 (Timeline Service v.2) to trunk
Date Fri, 01 Jul 2016 15:47:56 GMT
Thanks everyone for chiming in on the discussion. Since no blockers were
raised, I'll go ahead and start a vote thread.


On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 11:32 AM, 俊平堵 <junping_du@apache.org> wrote:

> Thanks Sangjin, Li and for sharing your points also. Yes. That's my
> original point that we shouldn't bind the merge of YARN-2928 to trunk with
> any alpha release in the short term. Actually, from this ATS v2 merge case,
> we can see the value of keeping trunk independent of short-term releases as
> the bar of trunk merging is different from alpha release.
> Let's discuss 3.0.0-alpha release plan and scope in other threads and
> focus on merging ATS v2 to trunk here. Again, big +1 to merge ATS v2 to
> trunk.
> 2016-06-24 10:37 GMT-07:00 Li Lu <llu@hortonworks.com>:
>> On Jun 24, 2016, at 09:59, Sangjin Lee <sjlee@apache.org<mailto:
>> sjlee@apache.org>> wrote:
>> Also for my understanding, the implication of merging it to trunk is that
>> it would be included in 3.0.0-alpha1 (unless 3.0.0-alpha1 gets cut before
>> the merge), right?
>> Thanks Sangjin and yes, if the 3.0.0-alpha branch is cut after we merge,
>> that will be included? That said, maybe we do not want to strongly couple
>> the merge plan with release plans now since YARN-2928 not yet merged in
>> trunk?

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message