Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51185200B21 for ; Thu, 12 May 2016 03:01:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 4FAB1160A18; Thu, 12 May 2016 01:01:31 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 706DA160A17 for ; Thu, 12 May 2016 03:01:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 64144 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2016 01:01:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact yarn-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list yarn-dev@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63802 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2016 01:01:26 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2016 01:01:26 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id C5FF9C0218; Thu, 12 May 2016 01:01:25 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.549 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.549 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx2-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K-7OMJz_VDZH; Thu, 12 May 2016 01:01:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi0-f48.google.com (mail-oi0-f48.google.com [209.85.218.48]) by mx2-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx2-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 669D45F369; Thu, 12 May 2016 01:01:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f48.google.com with SMTP id x201so96285383oif.3; Wed, 11 May 2016 18:01:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=pjdjiijezaN+zWKbDIzp2l9h8FnavmYnsxqbFYTGoqQ=; b=TwgOpq2dMk9KR5/B03jTDWtW22mPR7u/Gh4nRpZ4fu36X6t7pa/fhkKK/cW6koSeDj aunhgNEAXU03mN70PDiRruPBjhCV/0MwhXUW3WuWbUwfhNvhMsoDzu4B5jZHOLK2VHH6 NaFM2+9Hood1flDGUhDyrtbYpviGXhuLWXZKycsNxboidxcnvQAI+k/oBqueMmEH+MbA RbGIglJ9vc0xAZNOzqKH5gzNhMYpVzK1jEyna6Jt5/gL4V+8EkMnDYhlnfH6YBBgR6k4 1xmrdaLhE3hhtJZuGLpWtYOEn4i1jv9GgW46ZL3kDouEB86z0JWMMQ7HlxpizSx3VB+L iYng== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=pjdjiijezaN+zWKbDIzp2l9h8FnavmYnsxqbFYTGoqQ=; b=OzMXHNOjFyurRwkGh3nbV+5XTX+PDVjbj1q/lpVoNxYqzha+ahRbv3ojMx5zLItIQE qqDFNIOf9TwiO/PgsvqBtvLBcBBFAPhh28GCexLVWZgIXhvUHOR4ZbbSKkn20CqElndK johEah3g7GLoilgY0jx8DnZcmvqV74vIl3XY+r3v1w5v9cETFyDQP3aNSNEKbs0XS00I HumC+GNKev0zb9jJ+iTpoRbrqMrULnmIqKo20HyLpkzOQSoB4PeF7HAbs9Eb8ru8dCC4 2u/83PIRVDBfIODOuvm5iqftfPmv8i+pSTHFd4HggCz5gi9CJTkUIPFIP3fX9g29Mn8W TGqA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FW3sUbyBV51l/wSMurxdC3YPn5Su2zJme0B8ZSftGdBx2sq5EfT3OgAj2lh3fMqO5HOCIhfxTvVOhYRsw== X-Received: by 10.202.61.197 with SMTP id k188mr3871631oia.203.1463014882479; Wed, 11 May 2016 18:01:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: sjlee0@gmail.com Received: by 10.157.47.209 with HTTP; Wed, 11 May 2016 18:01:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <0C22896E-D77B-4DE4-99A2-9D81E150779C@hortonworks.com> <49120AE6-98D9-4CC2-A6A6-4C322A25F1D6@apache.org> <2A5F3F89-C79B-42BD-98AC-246CF33D4C47@apache.org> <33E01D1B-C416-464F-8E18-0B368A52DFF3@apache.org> <4B44247B-AFB2-4803-BDB0-251A8270F98C@apache.org> <2F9B8811-8240-454A-8599-64BE4B15CE2F@apache.org> <7CCEC640-5BCA-4ECC-976B-8630F4C0DD72@apache.org> <33841919-A63C-40BC-992D-9B98424BFBFC@hortonworks.com> From: Sangjin Lee Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 18:01:02 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: DqxJ4vn1VV77GhyUiTsc5qjZu6A Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Release thread] 2.8.0 release activities To: Wangda Tan Cc: "mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org" , "yarn-dev@hadoop.apache.org" , "hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org" , "common-dev@hadoop.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113dcfc85f164e05329ab202 archived-at: Thu, 12 May 2016 01:01:31 -0000 --001a113dcfc85f164e05329ab202 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I see the following list of JIRAs from HADOOP and HDFS as blockers for 2.8.0. Other JIRAs are either old issues with little movement or new issues that don't appear to be as critical/ready. - HADOOP-12893 - HADOOP-12892 - HADOOP-10940 (patch ready?) - HADOOP-12971 (can be done relatively quickly?) - HDFS-7959 - HDFS-7597 (needs review/some more work?) I would propose moving the rest out of scope for 2.8.0 (23 JIRAs). Let me know what you think. On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 5:37 PM, Wangda Tan wrote: > Sounds good to me :). > > Jian and I have looked at all existing 2.8.0 blockers and criticals today= . > To me more than half of MR/YARN blockers/criticals of 2.8 should be moved > out. Left comments on these JIRAs asked original owners, plan to update > target version of these JIRAs early next week. > > Will keep this thread updated. > > Thanks, > Wangda > > > On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 5:06 PM, Sangjin Lee wrote: > >> How about this? I'll review the HADOOP/HDFS bugs in that list to come up >> with true blockers for 2.8.0 or JIRAs that are close to being ready. I'l= l >> report the list here. Then folks can chime in if you agree >> >> Perhaps Wangda, you can go over the YARN/MR bugs. Sound like a plan? >> >> Thanks, >> Sangjin >> >> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 4:26 PM, Wangda Tan wrote: >> >>> +1, we should close such staled JIRAs to avoid doing unnecessary checks >>> for >>> every releases. >>> >>> I'm working on reviewing YARN/MR critical/blocker patches currently, it >>> gonna very helpful if someone else can help with reviewing Common/HDFS >>> JIRAs. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Wangda >>> >>> >>> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Sangjin Lee wrote: >>> >>> > Where do we stand in terms of closing out blocker/critical issues for >>> > 2.8.0? I still see 50 open JIRAs in Vinod's list: >>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=3D12334985 >>> > >>> > But I see a lot of JIRAs with no patches or very stale patches. It >>> would be >>> > a good exercise to come up with the list of JIRAs that we need to blo= ck >>> > 2.8.0 for and focus our attention on closing them out. Thoughts? >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > Sangjin >>> > >>> > On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 5:05 AM, Steve Loughran < >>> stevel@hortonworks.com> >>> > wrote: >>> > >>> > > >>> > > > On 23 Apr 2016, at 01:24, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli < >>> vinodkv@apache.org> >>> > > wrote: >>> > > > >>> > > > We are not converging - there=E2=80=99s still 58 more. I need hel= p from the >>> > > community in addressing / review 2.8.0 blockers. If folks can start >>> with >>> > > reviewing Patch available tickets, that=E2=80=99ll be great. >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > I'm still doing the s3a stuff, other people testing and reviewing >>> this >>> > > stuff welcome. >>> > > >>> > > in particular, I could do with others playing with this patch of >>> mine, >>> > > which adds counters and things into S3a, based on the azure >>> > instrumentation >>> > > >>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13028 >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >>> >> >> > --001a113dcfc85f164e05329ab202--