hadoop-yarn-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nick Dimiduk <ndimi...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.6.1 RC0
Date Wed, 16 Sep 2015 19:05:06 GMT
Hi folks,

I ran a modified version [0] of the compatibility checking tool we use in
HBase over this release. There's one source-related issue [1] in YARN API
that may need to be addressed in the next candidate. Otherwise, it's
looking pretty clean for a patch release. Nice job!

[0]: http://people.apache.org/~ndimiduk/check_compat_hadoop.patch
[1]:
http://people.apache.org/~ndimiduk/release-2.6.0_release-2.6.1-RC0_compat_report.html

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
vinodkv@hortonworks.com> wrote:

> One more popped in from  Jeff Zhang from Apache Tez: YARN-4154.
>
> Looking at that too for RC1.
>
> Thanks
> +Vinod
>
> > On Sep 11, 2015, at 11:37 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
> vinodkv@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Sangjin and Akira for finding the bug and the fix!
> >
> > This fix is needed because YARN-1809 was pulled in. I further found 3
> more related fixes that need to be pulled in because of YARN-1809:
> YARN-1884 and YARN-3544 (UI fixes), YARN-3740 (to avoid incompat).
> >
> > This VOTE thread is closed now, I’ll spin a new RC with those patches.
> >
> > Thanks
> > +Vinod
> >
> >
> >> On Sep 11, 2015, at 2:40 AM, Akira AJISAKA <ajisakaa@oss.nttdata.co.jp>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> I could reproduce the issue, and I found YARN-3171 will fix it.
> >>
> >> Hi Vinod, would you include YARN-3171?
> >> I applied the patch to branch-2.6.1 locally and confirmed the issue was
> fixed.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Akira
> >>
> >> On 9/11/15 09:16, Sangjin Lee wrote:
> >>> I verified the signatures for both source and the binary tarballs. I
> >>> started up a pseudo-distributed cluster, and tested simple apps such as
> >>> sleep and terasort.
> >>>
> >>> I do see one issue with the RM UI where the sorting by id is broken.
> The
> >>> table is not rendered in the expected id-descending order, and when I
> click
> >>> the sort control, nothing happens. Sorting by other columns works fine.
> >>>
> >>> Is anyone else able to reproduce the issue? I checked 2.6.0, and it
> works
> >>> fine on 2.6.0.
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
> vinodkv@apache.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi all,
> >>>>
> >>>> After a nearly month long [1] toil, with loads of help from Sangjin
> Lee
> >>>> and Akira Ajisaka, and 153 commits later, I've created a release
> candidate
> >>>> RC0 for hadoop-2.6.1.
> >>>>
> >>>> The RC is available at:
> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~vinodkv/hadoop-2.6.1-RC0/
> >>>>
> >>>> The RC tag in git is: release-2.6.1-RC0
> >>>>
> >>>> The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org at
> >>>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1020
> >>>>
> >>>> Some notes from our release process
> >>>> -  - Sangjin and I moved out a bunch of items pending from 2.6.1 [2]
-
> >>>> non-committed but desired patches. 2.6.1 is already big as is and is
> late
> >>>> by any standard, we can definitely include them in the next release.
> >>>> - The 2.6.1 wiki page [3] captures some (but not all) of the context
> of
> >>>> the patches that we pushed in.
> >>>> - Given the number of fixes pushed [4] in, we had to make a bunch of
> >>>> changes to our original plan - we added a few improvements that
> helped us
> >>>> backport patches easier (or in many cases made backports possible),
> and we
> >>>> dropped a few that didn't make sense (HDFS-7831, HDFS-7926, HDFS-7676,
> >>>> HDFS-7611, HDFS-7843, HDFS-8850).
> >>>> - I ran all the unit tests which (surprisingly?) passed. (Except for
> one,
> >>>> which pointed out a missing fix HDFS-7552).
> >>>>
> >>>> As discussed before [5]
> >>>> - This release is the first point release after 2.6.0
> >>>> - I’d like to use this as a starting release for 2.6.2 in a few weeks
> >>>> and then follow up with more of these.
> >>>>
> >>>> Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 5
> days.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Vinod
> >>>>
> >>>> [1] Hadoop 2.6.1 Release process thread:
> >>>> http://markmail.org/thread/wkbgkxkhntx5tlux
> >>>> [2] 2.6.1 Pending tickets:
> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12331711
> >>>> [3] 2.6.1 Wiki page:
> >>>> https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Release-2.6.1-Working-Notes
> >>>> [4] List of 2.6.1 patches pushed:
> >>>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=fixVersion%20%3D%202.6.1%20and%20labels%20%3D%20%222.6.1-candidate%22
> >>>> [5] Planning Hadoop 2.6.1 release:
> >>>> http://markmail.org/thread/sbykjn5xgnksh6wg
> >>>>
> >>>> PS:
> >>>> - Note that branch-2.6 which will be the base for 2.6.2 doesn't have
> >>>> these fixes yet. Once 2.6.1 goes through, I plan to rebase branch-2.6
> based
> >>>> off 2.6.1.
> >>>> - Patches that got into 2.6.1 all the way from 2.8 are NOT in 2.7.2
> yet,
> >>>> this will be done as a followup.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message