hadoop-yarn-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sangjin Lee <sj...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Planning Hadoop 2.6.1 release
Date Fri, 31 Jul 2015 17:07:25 GMT
Thanks Akira.

I'd like to make one small correction. If we're getting HDFS-7704, then we
should also get HDFS-7916. My earlier comment was assuming HDFS-7704 was
not included in the list. But if is (and I think it should), then we should
also get HDFS-7916 as it addresses an important issue related to HDFS-7704.
Hope it makes it clear.

Sangjin

On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Akira AJISAKA <ajisakaa@oss.nttdata.co.jp>
wrote:

> Thanks Joep and your team members for creating the list. I really
> appreciate your work. I looked your 'not yet marked with 2.6.1-candidate'
> list and categorized them.
>
> 1) Now marked as 2.6.1-candidate and I agree with you to keep it marked.
>
> * HDFS-7213
> * HDFS-7788
> * HDFS-7884
> * HDFS-7930
> * YARN-2856
> * YARN-3222
> * YARN-3238
> * YARN-3464
> * YARN-3526
> * YARN-3850
>
> Thanks Sangjin for creating patches for branch-2.6.
>
> 2) Not yet marked as 2.6.1-candidate that I'd like to see in 2.6.1
>
> * HDFS-7182
> * HDFS-7314
> * HDFS-7704
> * HDFS-7894
> * HDFS-7929 and HDFS-8480 (they are related)
> * HDFS-7980
> * HDFS-8245
> * HDFS-8270
> * HDFS-8404
> * HDFS-8486
> * MAPREDUCE-5465
> * MAPREDUCE-5649
> * MAPREDUCE-6166
> * MAPREDUCE-6238
> * MAPREDUCE-6300
> * YARN-2952
> * YARN-2997
> * YARN-3094
> * YARN-3176 (to be fixed soon, I think)
> * YARN-3231
> * HADOOP-11295
> * HADOOP-11812
>
> 3) Not yet marked as 2.6.1-candidate. I'd like to drop
>
> * HDFS-7281 (incompatible change)
> * HDFS-7446 (this looks to be an improvement)
> * HDFS-7916 (cannot apply to branch-2.6 as Sangjin mentioned)
>
> Hi Vinod, could you mark the issues in 2) as 2.6.1-candidate?
>
> I'd like to freeze the candidate list in about 7 days and start
> backporting them. Do you have any thoughts?
>
> Regards,
> Akira
>
>
> On 7/25/15 10:32, Sangjin Lee wrote:
>
>> Out of the JIRAs we proposed, please remove HDFS-7916. I don't think it
>> applies to 2.6.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Sangjin
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
>> vinodkv@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>
>> I’ve added them all to the 2.6.1-candidate list. I included everything
>>> even though some of them are major tickets. The list is getting large, we
>>> will have to cut these down once we get down to the next phase of
>>> figuring
>>> out what to include and what not to.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> +Vinod
>>>
>>> On Jul 21, 2015, at 2:15 AM, Akira AJISAKA <ajisakaa@oss.nttdata.co.jp>
>>>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks Vinod for updating the candidate list.
>>>> I'd like to include the followings 12 JIRAs:
>>>>
>>>> * YARN-3641
>>>> * YARN-3585
>>>> * YARN-2910
>>>> * HDFS-8431
>>>> * HDFS-7830
>>>> * HDFS-7763
>>>> * HDFS-7742
>>>> * HDFS-7235
>>>> * HDFS-7225
>>>> * MAPREDUCE-6324
>>>> * HADOOP-11934
>>>> * HADOOP-11491
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Akira
>>>>
>>>> On 7/18/15 11:13, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>   - I also have a bunch of patches that I’d like to include, will
>>>>> update
>>>>>
>>>> them right away.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I’ve just finished this. The latest 2.6.1-candidate list is up at 64
>>>>>
>>>> JIRAs.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Others, please look at the list and post anything else you’d like to
>>>>>
>>>> get included for 2.6.1.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> +Vinod
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jul 15, 2015, at 6:24 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
>>>>>
>>>> vinodkv@hortonworks.com<mailto:vinodkv@hortonworks.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Alright, I’d like to make progress while the issue is hot.
>>>>>
>>>>> I created a label to discuss on the candidate list of patches:
>>>>>
>>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=labels%20%3D%202.6.1-candidate
>>> <
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=labels%20=%202.6.1-candidate>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Next steps, I’ll do the following
>>>>>   - Review 2.7 and 2.8 blocker/critical tickets and see what makes
>>>>> sense
>>>>>
>>>> for 2.6.1 and add as candidates
>>>
>>>>   - I haven’t reviewed the current list yet, the seed list is from this
>>>>>
>>>> email thread. Will review them.
>>>
>>>>   - I also have a bunch of patches that I’d like to include, will update
>>>>>
>>>> them right away.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Others, please look at the current list and let me know what else you’d
>>>>>
>>>> like to include.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I’d like to keep this ‘candidate-collection’ cycle’ for a max
of a week
>>>>>
>>>> and then start the release process. @Akira, let’s sync up offline on
>>> how to
>>> take this forward in terms of the release process.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> +Vinod
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message