hadoop-yarn-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Arun C Murthy <...@hortonworks.com>
Subject Re: Re-swizzle 2.3
Date Sat, 01 Feb 2014 00:29:42 GMT
Thanks Vinod, appreciate it!

I think we are very close.

Here is a handy ref. to the list of blockers: http://s.apache.org/hadoop-2.3.0-blockers

I'd appreciate if folks can help expedite these fixes, and, equally importantly bring up others
they feel should be blockers for 2.3.0.

thanks,
Arun

On Jan 30, 2014, at 12:42 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vinodkv@apache.org> wrote:

> That was quite some exercise, but I'm done with it now. Updated YARN's and MAPREDUCE's
CHANGES.txt on trunk, branch-2 and branch-2.3. Let me know if you find some inaccuracies.
> 
> Thanks,
> +Vinod
> 
> On Jan 29, 2014, at 10:49 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vinodkv@apache.org> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Okay, I'll look at YARN and MR CHANGES.txt problems. Seems like they aren't addressed
yet.
>> 
>> +Vinod
>> 
>> 
>> On Jan 29, 2014, at 3:24 PM, Andrew Wang <andrew.wang@cloudera.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> I just finished tuning up branch-2.3 and fixing up the HDFS and Common
>>> CHANGES.txt in trunk, branch-2, and branch-2.3. I had to merge back a few
>>> JIRAs committed between the swizzle and now where the fix version was 2.3
>>> but weren't in branch-2.3.
>>> 
>>> I think the only two HDFS and Common JIRAs that are marked for 2.4 are
>>> these:
>>> 
>>> HDFS-5842 Cannot create hftp filesystem when using a proxy user ugi and a
>>> doAs on a secure cluster
>>> HDFS-5781 Use an array to record the mapping between FSEditLogOpCode and
>>> the corresponding byte value
>>> 
>>> Jing, these both look safe to me if you want to merge them back, or I can
>>> just do it.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Andrew
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 1:21 PM, Doug Cutting <cutting@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Jason Lowe <jlowe@yahoo-inc.com>
wrote:
>>>>> It is a bit concerning that the JIRA history showed that the target
>>> version
>>>>> was set at some point in the past but no record of it being cleared.
>>>> 
>>>> Perhaps the version itself was renamed?
>>>> 
>>>> Doug
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to 
> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, 
> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader 
> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that 
> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or 
> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have 
> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately 
> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
> <signature.asc>

--
Arun C. Murthy
Hortonworks Inc.
http://hortonworks.com/



-- 
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to 
which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, 
privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader 
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that 
any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or 
forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately 
and delete it from your system. Thank You.

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message