Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-yarn-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-yarn-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 81C9B10B0A for ; Wed, 8 Jan 2014 01:05:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 42583 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jan 2014 01:05:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-yarn-dev-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42523 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jan 2014 01:05:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact yarn-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: yarn-dev@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list yarn-dev@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42514 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jan 2014 01:05:58 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jan 2014 01:05:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of eli@cloudera.com designates 209.85.216.179 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.179] (HELO mail-qc0-f179.google.com) (209.85.216.179) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jan 2014 01:05:52 +0000 Received: by mail-qc0-f179.google.com with SMTP id i8so876848qcq.38 for ; Tue, 07 Jan 2014 17:05:32 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=FncbUxS57cunsCQjMRaEIcWQr7cUv9DxD8YBWdwtAeI=; b=Ws0CVjYhrW5F5BqCQpPDTAQRpNqyjsx6A0P2OHii1Fjv3Dopxo5PBeqzsCYJ9XNiYQ VG4sMWT2bscsrfoyYqym33PftTuuwvUismsDDXKzKzKqs3THcnPeYxwljpptrvdutBY7 ZZ7P3Ly6jyzC4ysdArGoz6mBMC0nnyWUsBKGytIshEtRPh3IoHPYzdpyaFhxWVL/hKtA +fC0ghDqamAVC94GyDybRs52mYv4Ne4ya6FGk/Hym5wa7rz0te0tdYxepZfU6QLjPlUV wRx60MgjyZd4+gx4wsnXGf9lb9foUXFiWYhT1xx7QwCEhh2+wqD+K+4aNJGCoV0f+90q UayQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlHWdNPjltpuG9NeQGauu9g1TOad6wJnpI9mgLEILsGTFiKCwBePBFywDcW4VUvuUhfY81Q MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.111.195 with SMTP id t3mr5178969qap.2.1389143132149; Tue, 07 Jan 2014 17:05:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.70.198 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 17:05:31 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 17:05:31 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: When to mark a JIRA incompatible? From: Eli Collins To: "yarn-dev@hadoop.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b60457eef301f04ef6b1687 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --047d7b60457eef301f04ef6b1687 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 When it's incompatible with a previous release. You can change a new public API several times in an incompatible way before you release it. Not yarn specific btw, same rules for all of Hadoop. On Tuesday, January 7, 2014, Karthik Kambatla wrote: > Hey devs, > > Was just wondering if the Incompatible Change flag on JIRA is to be checked > if the patch is incompatible with an existing release or even if it is > incompatible with contents of branch-2? > > For instance, YARN-1568 fixes something introduced by YARN-1029 that was > only committed yesterday, but in an incompatible way. > > Thanks > Karthik > --047d7b60457eef301f04ef6b1687--