hadoop-yarn-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Milind Bhandarkar <mbhandar...@gopivotal.com>
Subject Re: libyarn?
Date Mon, 21 Oct 2013 17:22:13 GMT
Thanks Tucu.

I have decided that for now, we will keep libyarn separate of Yarn, but
Apache licensed. So, that once protocols are deemed stable, and when there
are more C-based frameworks on yarn, we can reconsider contributing to Yarn.

- milind


---
Milind Bhandarkar
Chief Scientist
Pivotal
+1-650-523-3858 (W)
+1-408-666-8483 (C)


On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Alejandro Abdelnur <tucu@cloudera.com>wrote:

> Milind, one thing to keep in mind, if I got previous discussions right, is
> that the API stability in Hadoop 2 it does not include PB protocols yet but
> client APIs.
>
> Cheers.
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Eli Collins <eli@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Milind Bhandarkar <
> > mbhandarkar@gopivotal.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks for your input, Eli.
> > >
> > > Since you mention libhdfs, now that hdfs PB protocols have stabilized,
> > for
> > > quite some time, would folks think that a native C binding for hdfs
> > belongs
> > > outside of HDFS? I think libyarn decision should be based on similar
> > > feeling  too.
> > >
> > >
> > It would be incompatible to remove it, and it's actively maintained
> in-tree
> > by the same people who work on hdfs so I don't see why we'd want to
> remove
> > it.  Again, the decision should be made by the community of people
> working
> > on libhdfs.
> >
> > Ditto libyarn, if they want to contribute the code to Yarn why don't they
> > do so?
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Alejandro
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message