Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-yarn-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-yarn-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 62DF110B15 for ; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 04:09:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19785 invoked by uid 500); 16 Aug 2013 04:09:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-yarn-dev-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17804 invoked by uid 500); 16 Aug 2013 04:09:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact yarn-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: yarn-dev@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list yarn-dev@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17777 invoked by uid 99); 16 Aug 2013 04:09:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 04:09:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of tucu@cloudera.com designates 209.85.128.53 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.128.53] (HELO mail-qe0-f53.google.com) (209.85.128.53) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 04:09:40 +0000 Received: by mail-qe0-f53.google.com with SMTP id 1so952808qee.26 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 21:09:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=OiMBuO9t7R13RsX4+VYPi6eDzHCX3FRov4Wj1/xpMik=; b=hxRsHLiijYx4wbOCwEjin/cb2X0N3gXZyNMp4FCdFeCn4CBL46U6m4gT6ftvCOCyjz bi8VDtkHQ4qlT7QFCcW9xyILXML5zAFcdaW3woPXMx6HTHlblR1obAOulWGizXf+VFz9 i/MYb/1Se+8PYf7NSKlEz8coSZtZ/GhEw+d/Nrw1wdq3IC5AmcaTf+XFmhB9Ko/DQ/NT vR7td6Iyqj53a4tmodgwAMPJO688VK0nBwWbcxSIwXsw21KCp0oPc3gW2NpAWDohHTEx s5TM8VixCNx5+5ED4/2dZgKedkDS3H2Vn3RS2C5Hl0fimPknAEoXfSy85zJJ+QKT0ICz o0cw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn0pQ0Fe/H+cbM4SILMZq/kHD1e92lg38tb15qrzOsF0UEIMYncwsurQN6xw4xuPQO59EEW X-Received: by 10.224.57.69 with SMTP id b5mr1035815qah.21.1376626159606; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 21:09:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.49.105.72 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 21:08:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130816030223.GI3524@tpx> References: <20130811004643.GD3524@tpx> <20130816030223.GI3524@tpx> From: Alejandro Abdelnur Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 21:08:49 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.6-alpha To: "mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org" , "common-dev@hadoop.apache.org" , "hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org" , "yarn-dev@hadoop.apache.org" , Arun Murthy Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e012945823b6d6604e408c1d3 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --089e012945823b6d6604e408c1d3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 it should be straight forward adding the license headers to the release notes. please make sure apache-rat:check passes on the RC before publishing it. Arun, as you are about to cut the new RC for 2.1.0-beta, can you please make sure the license headers are used in the releasenotes HTML files? Thx On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 8:02 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > Alejandro, > > looking into the source code: it seems that release notes never had license > boilerplate in it, hence 2.0.6-alpha doesn't have as well. > > I have fixed CHANGES with new optimistic date of the release and upload rc1 > right now. > > Please let me know if you feel like we need start doing the license for the > releasenotes in this release. > > Thanks, > Cos > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 10:40AM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote: > > OK: > > * verified MD5 > > * verified signature > > * expanded source tar and did a build > > * configured pseudo cluster and run a couple of example MR jobs > > * did a few HTTP calls to HTTFS > > > > NOT OK: > > * CHANGES.txt files have 2.0.6 as UNRELEASED, they should have the date > the > > RC vote ends > > * 'mvn apache-rat:check' fails, releasenotes HTML files don't have > license > > headers, > > > > I think we need to address the NO OK points (specially the last one), > they > > are trivial. > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Konstantin Boudnik > wrote: > > > > > All, > > > > > > I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.6-alpha that I > > > would > > > like to release. > > > > > > This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a of > > > issues > > > as outlined on the security list. > > > > > > The RC is available at: > > > http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.6-alpha-rc0/ > > > The RC tag in svn is here: > > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.0.6-alpha-rc0 > > > > > > The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org. > > > > > > Please try the release bits and vote; the vote will run for the usual 7 > > > days. > > > > > > Thanks for your voting > > > Cos > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Alejandro > -- Alejandro --089e012945823b6d6604e408c1d3--