hadoop-yarn-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Harsh J (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Created] (YARN-555) ContainerLaunchContext is buggy when it comes to setter methods on a new instance
Date Mon, 08 Apr 2013 08:25:15 GMT
Harsh J created YARN-555:
----------------------------

             Summary: ContainerLaunchContext is buggy when it comes to setter methods on a
new instance
                 Key: YARN-555
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-555
             Project: Hadoop YARN
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: api
    Affects Versions: 2.0.3-alpha
            Reporter: Harsh J
            Priority: Minor


If you look at the API of ContainerLaunchContext, its got setter methods, such as for setResource,
setCommands, etc…:

http://hadoop.apache.org/docs/current/api/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/api/records/ContainerLaunchContext.html#setCommands(java.util.List)

However, there's certain things broken in its use here that am trying to understand. Let me
explain with some code context:

1. I initialize a proper CLC for an ApplicationSubmissionContext (appContext).

{code}
ContainerLaunchContext appMasterLaunchContext = Records.newRecord(ContainerLaunchContext.class);
appContext.setAMContainerSpec(appMasterLaunchContext);
{code}

2. I create a resource request of 130 MB, as applicationMasterResource, and try to set it
into the CLC via:

{code}
appContext.getAMContainerSpec().setResource(applicationMasterResource);
{code}

3. This works OK. If I query it back now, it returns 130 for a {{getMemory()}} call.

4. So I attempt to do the same with setCommands/setEnvironment/etc., all of which fail to
mutate cause the check in CLC's implementation class disregards whatever I try to set. This
is cause of these null checks which keep passing:

{code}
  // ContainerLaunchContextPBImpl.java
  @Override
  public void setCommands(final List<String> commands) {
    if (commands == null)
      return;
    initCommands();
    this.commands.clear();
    this.commands.addAll(commands);
  }
{code}

This is rather non intuitive as a check. If I am to set something, setting it should take
place. If it is null, do not return but instead set whats provided? I'm not even sure why
that null check exists - it seems to do so from the start of time.

However, {{setResource(…)}} works pretty fine, as the call has no such odd check:

{code}
  @Override
  public void setResource(Resource resource) {
    maybeInitBuilder();
    if (resource == null) 
      builder.clearResource();
    this.resource = resource;
  }
{code}

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Mime
View raw message