Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-yarn-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-yarn-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7BCD7D27A for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 20:07:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 29813 invoked by uid 500); 13 Dec 2012 20:07:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-yarn-dev-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29764 invoked by uid 500); 13 Dec 2012 20:07:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact yarn-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: yarn-dev@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list yarn-dev@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29755 invoked by uid 99); 13 Dec 2012 20:07:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 20:07:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of lohit.vijayarenu@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.176] (HELO mail-ia0-f176.google.com) (209.85.210.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 20:07:26 +0000 Received: by mail-ia0-f176.google.com with SMTP id y26so2349356iab.35 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 12:07:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=1oMiiU9dmtnl89GAig2RUiT0eCeI2s0i9uoMzG4zeXM=; b=eOP27pawENiJBBE9yB81ZT+6bySwEBhObLjcYfbfgp223dB7948bzf1jchS0VWTAtD BoWsdJuZlEHxXAhZIEzmPn+7283afTj+wvotk45+xGXCqI/QRweEfkdBogkpr9Tv4qYZ yXYSuwBSIIAqcr7xaiDoP5W0V+4V01Xn16gpabo8Etc2q6FWSj0dSl/pgUbOnDgDOp9d 5S/e66P69TvjkJknxkZ1Z7wGUnBXC89pv4IvDdKvAvplxjTWHAct0YSbddeviBLknRdB mE8XUETnjzPO2qWBUEuHmRWsY3N9IgWOQpZuruILoLk8IqazS/xjnkT5f/jh+EXMPISz wdMw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.131.133 with SMTP id z5mr2594803ics.10.1355429225951; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 12:07:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.9.113 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 12:07:05 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 12:07:05 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Uneven distribution of container allocations From: lohit To: yarn-dev@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba21243387f0d204d0c175fe X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --90e6ba21243387f0d204d0c175fe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I am running hadoop-2.0.3 alpha branch. Right now I am trying TestDFSIO, where I would like to have even distribution of tasks. As soon as I submit job RM tends to allocate as many containers as possible from subset of nodes. 2012/12/13 Thomas Graves > What kind of job are you running? What version of YARN? > > Tom > > On 12/13/12 12:24 AM, "lohit" wrote: > > >Hi Devs, > > > >I am running few experiments on YARN. On a 50 node cluster I run only one > >job. > >If I kick off job with 150 tasks, I would expect on an average 3 tasks in > >containers per node. > >But I see many nodes end up having 29-30 containers spawned and many > >without any tasks at all. > >Do I have to use some kind of parameter (delayed scheduling) to achieve > >even distribution? > > > >-- > >Have a Nice Day! > >Lohit > > -- Have a Nice Day! Lohit --90e6ba21243387f0d204d0c175fe--