Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D22D200B30 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 08:21:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 6BE19160A53; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 06:21:14 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 8CEC2160A65 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 08:21:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 65998 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2016 06:21:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list user@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65987 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2016 06:21:09 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 06:21:09 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 8E178C0E1C for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 06:21:09 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.199 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.199 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx2-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09DOSV_VIBKd for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 06:21:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-io0-f170.google.com (mail-io0-f170.google.com [209.85.223.170]) by mx2-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx2-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id F38095F256 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 06:21:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io0-f170.google.com with SMTP id 5so122258853ioy.1 for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2016 23:21:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=QjPdwdM5RAgGlHgNXpmuz34Umz3+mYw4GtFNWCHj6Ew=; b=QyEc8eZyY/R/r6zRtn0up4dBBjPVDSWLaDPiOWQrIFUUN6jM6wR3f33R6dH7TO4eay J0L31SZMeYZTRdZBzk0tAaF1jWBhgShH28wkFMQHdla4YTIn8FTrILE5nXhogG5hxS4/ 0YKvQF7Y2lzr74v48o4AOrXrfuaI78XR9NvDWlhUQnrnuTGsj35BYgm9xxg7ESpMe6RY LCzxd+Q9/7TIIbXZ1PbOk/uo2IKUp5u8Aa4hdrSUPZb3h2LdjTisV/gGQtpJmkSeam7v Fua+XcOyy+yueIxBFGlHf0deKzJg94qn9VPcx+Ii2ShafmW+FVmf7GyqS41otusFySG6 u5Ug== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=QjPdwdM5RAgGlHgNXpmuz34Umz3+mYw4GtFNWCHj6Ew=; b=Y3I8apwAwVu9lqOHov2PIZpM56a2Zs/i3t4oNfP8DLglrNBq0lC2k5cOGww1t8yx/o lQ/ay2zbLGa8keHCXGynDuM7Sgh67n+jKLLDnrkxmgxLerN5G9P0QCEyHyjllgPHzxF1 nBtNwyVyMV/EI8gNyCU7JjqD8OCih6onY2gcQBtaKKMhVeC1McRJam/ah3LdrM22Yooc y652GSEmgzsIfMdguXbQYmIoW2B/u1OSv1QsvWTsuQi4PGFVTtCnDMBICaemeGsu/HMW ++WUshHKH7SUQDiq8GtkXV1YfArTVzwO8IwGyHk69e8YHhTE+XFS5hoKWp8aT5RsyF37 DYuw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKFRCdq7BKn7RskCV7EcmYM01WI9TCtZpFs28RhBdTMOfThjcBL5F+0McQLtJqNEOQPpgDnB0n6jLg9zQ== X-Received: by 10.107.134.16 with SMTP id i16mr20173734iod.93.1466403665013; Sun, 19 Jun 2016 23:21:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.10.168 with HTTP; Sun, 19 Jun 2016 23:21:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: sandeep vura Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 11:51:04 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: CapacityScheduler vs. FairScheduler To: Alvin Chyan Cc: Lars Francke , user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113ec8928cf10a0535afb558 archived-at: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 06:21:14 -0000 --001a113ec8928cf10a0535afb558 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi, I too have same doubt !! Please clarify. Regards, sandeep.v On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 6:08 AM, Alvin Chyan wrote: > I have the same question. > > Thanks! > > > *Alvin Chyan*Lead Software Engineer, Data > 901 Marshall St, Suite 200, Redwood City, CA 94063 > > > turn.com | @TurnPlatform > > > This message is Turn Confidential, except for information included that is > already available to the public. If this message was sent to you > accidentally, please delete it. > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 11:04 AM, Lars Francke > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I've been using Hadoop for years and have always just taken for granted >> that FairScheduler = Cloudera and CapacityScheduler = Hortonworks/Yahoo. >> There are some comparisons but all of them are years old and somewhat (if >> not entirely) outdated. >> >> The documentation doesn't really help and neither does the Javadoc. The >> code of both is fairly complex. >> >> So my question is: How do these two Schedulers really differ today? What >> are some features that one has that the other doesn't? Are there any >> fundamental differences (anymore)? >> >> Any insight is welcome. >> >> Thank you! >> >> Cheers, >> Lars >> > > --001a113ec8928cf10a0535afb558 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,

I too have same doubt !! Please cla= rify.

Regards,
sandeep.v

On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 = at 6:08 AM, Alvin Chyan <alvin.chyan@turn.com> wrote:
=
I have the same question.

Thanks!

Alvin Chyan
Lead Softw= are Engineer, Data
901 Marshal= l St, Suite 200, Redwood City, CA 94063


turn.com= =C2=A0=C2=A0 | =C2=A0=C2=A0@TurnPlatform

This m= essage is Turn Confidential, except for information included that is alread= y available to the public. If this message was sent to you accidentally, pl= ease delete it.


On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 11:04 AM, Lars Franck= e <lars.francke@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,

I've been using H= adoop for years and have always just taken for granted that FairScheduler = =3D Cloudera and CapacityScheduler =3D Hortonworks/Yahoo. There are some co= mparisons but all of them are years old and somewhat (if not entirely) outd= ated.

The documentation doesn't really help an= d neither does the Javadoc. The code of both is fairly complex.
<= br>
So my question is: How do these two Schedulers really differ = today? What are some features that one has that the other doesn't? Are = there any fundamental differences (anymore)?

Any i= nsight is welcome.

Thank you!

=
Cheers,
Lars


--001a113ec8928cf10a0535afb558--