Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 24C4C1837A for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 01:44:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 54650 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2016 01:35:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-user-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54534 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2016 01:35:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list user@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54523 invoked by uid 99); 2 Feb 2016 01:35:49 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 01:35:49 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 6513A18034B for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 01:35:49 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.379 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.379 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2.5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-us-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mRRbWpc3xVD7 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 01:35:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm0-f50.google.com (mail-wm0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 4309420970 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 01:35:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f50.google.com with SMTP id l66so95702802wml.0 for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2016 17:35:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=76P2S62b/+WTTDjfySECK4gTbvPG+b/zv7DTnemlQTA=; b=ZkmFdCKy7Sx0hMp/pym30BEOT1CjYjkSe4fZ1R35jN5XJgqAEaXZw3R6zqhgsDT4DV i3/+xu+MX8LoO8J4NtP6I1wlvYcC+UuNBxTgZWYDJOoR1RDU9w7insAWzihebk0alyy0 bz1ZTDdFLUnTEH06gFu+E+3XCdvSW5NWKE7vHWuAzlkzjsVi5qOh/7xT/TNx4hbsb+03 tAx/cWlYbkkTtLZROsDLGb5FEV4g5jI9E7+zHf4pvHUsDKWVoZ4nmsU6dXzqw14Gze5Z TgQ80SPbXEBob/qwyelB1aN+t4ynPHS8YmfAMYAPtwZW6SKXeWWlcTUFS8ErV6AMkLjM Wgxw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=76P2S62b/+WTTDjfySECK4gTbvPG+b/zv7DTnemlQTA=; b=CI5KI7/NFTfyT3bgI0ma+ysXrP3AeCEErH0otjq4zSCWdugcdNU21WBOU9GG1pzCd1 6ZbDi03nkDsMj56zoCOb7t8yZKZfbkrqop9Sskhi6ZpTiFZ0vt31TQM8Plc4BI9UCfr5 0wJStruIeMefEndscY4r4sSKvrZcrSjn6nUvmcRtog1LPIvQIcX1eVgbklGyHvaP0Faw nmb8E9GOGyiYq90yJUTwgxOj4mt+6vBOETpUA2AFFkTtGHvjheYmavXLV547WrgwMW4d USLjnfmNA/td7cS5ko4U+SSngyl//HuHDXIHsHAxw+ZF62zrJQxwJv0C2WQw5ihKEbA/ 8UKw== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YORgt56D1KjuZZUsufaYfL0LGXFirNAaKmqrywy4tqEjb0rZrKKws3uJBrz2QAeV5UJgvJbuaXWbZXgQOQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.79.163 with SMTP id k3mr24314283wjx.117.1454376941315; Mon, 01 Feb 2016 17:35:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.27.5.85 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 17:35:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 17:35:41 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: "Reservation Exceeds Allowed number" when refreshing dynamic resource pools From: Buntu Dev To: Di Huang Cc: user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bf0d1e2f4ee38052abf8407 --047d7bf0d1e2f4ee38052abf8407 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Turning off multiple assign fixed the issue for me, its releated to this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4477 HTH On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Di Huang wrote: > Has your problem solved? I met the same problem as you. > > > Buntu Dev writes: > > > > > > > How does one configure YARN to get the containers allocated across nodes > in > the cluster, as I keep running into this when refreshing the resource pool: > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FSAppAttempt: > Reservation Exceeds Allowed number of nodes: > app_id=application_1452220058915_0013 existingReservations=5 > totalAvailableNodes=94 reservableNodesRatio=0.05 numAllowedReservations=5 > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > --047d7bf0d1e2f4ee38052abf8407 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Turning off multiple assign fixed the issue for = me, its releated to this:


On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Di Huang <= span dir=3D"ltr"><seusofthd@gmail.com> wrote:
Has your problem solved? I met the same problem as you.


Buntu Dev <buntudev@...> writes:

>
>
> How does one configure YARN to get the containers allocated across nod= es in
the cluster, as I keep running into this when refreshing the resource pool:=
>
> =C2=A0org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.fair.FSA= ppAttempt:
Reservation Exceeds Allowed number of nodes:
app_id=3Dapplication_1452220058915_0013 existingReservations=3D5
totalAvailableNodes=3D94 reservableNodesRatio=3D0.05 numAllowedReservations= =3D5
>
>
> Thanks!
>



--047d7bf0d1e2f4ee38052abf8407--