Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6D14D18DA8 for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 16:33:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 90638 invoked by uid 500); 2 Nov 2015 16:33:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-user-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90511 invoked by uid 500); 2 Nov 2015 16:33:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90496 invoked by uid 99); 2 Nov 2015 16:33:47 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Nov 2015 16:33:47 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id AC7BBC0F88 for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 16:33:46 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.899 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.899 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W4L5hzoUvSmd for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 16:33:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-f48.google.com (mail-pa0-f48.google.com [209.85.220.48]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 10BFA439C2 for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 16:33:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pasz6 with SMTP id z6so153163747pas.2 for ; Mon, 02 Nov 2015 08:33:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-type; bh=HkJUxyfbmXnRfv2Fdg31tmws4wOflucUgMcADaF5d9E=; b=zZyfUF5P4QBBHorZ6CSOnnZoqSNiQpkb4btOi8IeoXdL6cWxkPrThGLTNDaPYdxmAb 3/0edon0IxonNO2HNIzqnqOOUBhrdhefGkInof52bn0XHBqO41X0P1DNtBLo2HBshNLK AFSzD9GcWuRMNg4L2/bjfkSF2z0z4THKS5I0/SOyT9WkeSAW0F64OWib5TuCHo31MG8q EaG3ojvJu2OVKTUnHqvi7kH2/EcGuyeLiw5SRfPZSod6FAryj+4MaQmQ1TpFPCG+l0UR vbdxrB3cUSaPIGp2YjkGCPu6gCTP3fHRcCLP1yz9VpbIsE6iM0qld9qUz/SdfgFE5yWH rKYw== X-Received: by 10.68.182.161 with SMTP id ef1mr28174142pbc.79.1446482012158; Mon, 02 Nov 2015 08:33:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from [115.242.213.252] ([115.242.213.252]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id uy1sm19965113pac.39.2015.11.02.08.33.29 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 02 Nov 2015 08:33:31 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Exception while appending to an existing file in HDFS To: user@hadoop.apache.org References: <4CFC781D-F9A4-4A5E-97EC-3E876899B089@webaction.com> <5635E73E.4040006@gmail.com> <22FEBA2A-3F35-4ADC-9B89-BAD39D059350@webaction.com> From: ABHISHEK SINGH <23singhabhishek@gmail.com> Message-ID: <56379053.4060700@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 22:03:23 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <22FEBA2A-3F35-4ADC-9B89-BAD39D059350@webaction.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------060405000600040902000305" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------060405000600040902000305 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Niranjan, Glad to hear your issue was resolved. Actually, upgrading was a wise decision. Thanks, Abhishek On Monday 02 November 2015 03:59 PM, Niranjan Subramanian wrote: > Hi Abhishek, > > Thanks for your pointer on letting me know there is an issue from > 2.2.0 to 2.5.1, I just upgraded to 2.7.1 and without adding any of > these properties, it is working fine. > > Regards, > Niranjan > On 02-Nov-2015, at 1:38 pm, Niranjan Subramanian > > wrote: > >> Hey Abhishek, >> >> I tried both tweaks, still I ended up with same exception. Maybe I >> should try upgrading to 2.6.0 and see? >> >> Regards, >> Niranjan >> On 01-Nov-2015, at 3:49 pm, ABHISHEK SINGH <23singhabhishek@gmail.com >> > wrote: >> >>> ("dfs.datanode.socket.write.timeout", "20000"); >> > --------------060405000600040902000305 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Niranjan,

Glad to hear your issue was resolved. Actually, upgrading was a wise decision.

Thanks,
Abhishek

On Monday 02 November 2015 03:59 PM, Niranjan Subramanian wrote:
Hi Abhishek,�

Thanks for your pointer on letting me know there is an issue from 2.2.0 to 2.5.1, I just upgraded to 2.7.1 and without adding any of these properties, it is working fine.�

Regards,
Niranjan
On 02-Nov-2015, at 1:38 pm, Niranjan Subramanian <niranjan@webaction.com> wrote:

Hey Abhishek,

I tried both tweaks, still I ended up with same exception. Maybe I should try upgrading to 2.6.0 and see?�

Regards,
Niranjan
On 01-Nov-2015, at 3:49 pm, ABHISHEK SINGH <23singhabhishek@gmail.com> wrote:

("dfs.datanode.socket.write.timeout", "20000");



--------------060405000600040902000305--