Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6874211B77 for ; Sun, 11 May 2014 14:28:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75839 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2014 14:20:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-user-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75727 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2014 14:20:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75720 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2014 14:20:59 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 11 May 2014 14:20:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of chandralakshmikant90@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.42 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.42] (HELO mail-yh0-f42.google.com) (209.85.213.42) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 11 May 2014 14:20:55 +0000 Received: by mail-yh0-f42.google.com with SMTP id t59so5435241yho.15 for ; Sun, 11 May 2014 07:20:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=EheH7aofKnOv1TTd+cGF+UGDBRThcLFGUs8Ku6kwpcI=; b=tAnNX08J06nfhM9COgFBzbEGT0SYzumkLkWNYHgFh/kN34zrLjjjqNImcJ9GEuxl2O qDeW2Vikid2Ma6MAus6pK8MaIgQo+vql6PRD/XjxL0MsohNPZt+wdCSb4RQSFwxfRMLt YCOkp3pPwpgQ32D5t6p9DBCpqdq/zFFed4DbB7wZm1R6+8Xc9xbyXeCY3+lFqunKUacG VOKB6AjDuoCQyovCoWMrJ6b0Mf22k/tuJs9ia2gOTMYdlEjjbGK96Xa1hvZXhQFfiL/9 GE/vFYcpbEgiF1jlOgRyeRPaBEYJgBBuXudwDD/RJVslUkA9954A9e0Q8q7jPzQLlz6b oSOQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.236.85.45 with SMTP id t33mr32766079yhe.74.1399818031943; Sun, 11 May 2014 07:20:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.170.222.215 with HTTP; Sun, 11 May 2014 07:20:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 11 May 2014 19:50:31 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: speed of replication for under replicated blocks by namenode From: chandra kant To: "user@hadoop.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3005dd4e8d0d9204f9208801 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --20cf3005dd4e8d0d9204f9208801 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi, Some of my blocks are under replicated. Can anybody tell me at what speed namenode replicates it so that dfs.replication factor is satisfied and blocks become normal again? Or does it solely depend upon load factor on namenode and it can't be measured accurately? thanx Chandra --20cf3005dd4e8d0d9204f9208801 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,

=
Some of my= blocks are under replicated. Can anybody tell me at what speed namenode re= plicates it so that dfs.replication factor is satisfied and blocks become n= ormal again? Or does it solely depend upon load factor on namenode and it c= an't be measured accurately?

thanx
Chandra
--20cf3005dd4e8d0d9204f9208801--