Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 91835E34E for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 19:14:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 50182 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2013 19:13:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-user-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49953 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2013 19:13:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49946 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jan 2013 19:13:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 19:13:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of adi@cloudera.com designates 209.85.223.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.175] (HELO mail-ie0-f175.google.com) (209.85.223.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 19:13:50 +0000 Received: by mail-ie0-f175.google.com with SMTP id c12so2663280ieb.6 for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 11:13:29 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=g7S7J305nJ2a23HPS9WVoZ65MCjUETkzrs8x+Z8ri1o=; b=JdvV6UERDtDyXS0HT9DF1AK+slIB5CLhf7kOW297WogQPcqb/06LAC9ys7YsV4/0ij PN3wv7TdTWQ9ekOnqPr/lVWzuTnDhVi8R0oKoLCjr0I45pJgxYKoFTLub+DAzhZd4gdi pXuk2zA8jqI8a2G0vIh3Pues90fyTT7HmkJFSA6ozfU4xsPVOPf/4gjR9TkzfS7eEU0H +n2wfL4gAKdEhvd/DP3L/WKbkNaQ6W5RGTPICEn3d9yjrXXngQS/SVULAp5WSD+k/jKg iA2X0OYVpE8sUOH9mB6ftGCeCyu+qbX9doZztZo/R8NRauNd3gdRYPfLKQjk/Z3WfCSs E/Ng== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.151.225 with SMTP id ut1mr2156322igb.110.1359659609425; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 11:13:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.37.168 with HTTP; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 11:13:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <22324_1359651197_0MHI005OM1K8FF00_99DD75DC8938B743BBBC2CA54F7224A706D67714@NYSGMBXB06.a.wcmc-ad.net> References: <22324_1359651197_0MHI005OM1K8FF00_99DD75DC8938B743BBBC2CA54F7224A706D67714@NYSGMBXB06.a.wcmc-ad.net> Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 11:13:29 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Dell Hardware From: Andy Isaacson To: user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl/wcgFWtYk/4XoElS9O6Mv5CMNuHgVjx9K5HtOAONqnK2OnO0nCKBYe7+18w/TU9ktse6D X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 8:53 AM, Artem Ervits wrote: > Does anyone run Hadoop on Dell R720 model of servers? Dell site lists C2100 > model of servers as best fit for Hadoop workloads. What does community > recommend? The R720 supports up to 2 xeon CPUs and 8 drives in 2U. If configured appropriately it will work fine as a Hadoop node. For example, 2x Xeon, 64GB RAM, 8x 2TB SATA configured as JBOD, would be a reasonable worker node. Buy 20 of those and now you're cooking with gas. :) The C2100 is probably somewhat cheaper for a given storage amount since it fits 12 disks in a 2U chassis (so you don't need to buy as many machines to achieve a given amount of capacity). Dell doesn't provide a configurator for that model so I can't compare prices. Apparently it's using the previous generation of Xeon -- 5500/5600 versus e5 on the R720 -- which probably means poorer throughput per watt. The right answer will depend on your application and workload. -andy