Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5CC82D4FF for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 04:27:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 63992 invoked by uid 500); 20 Dec 2012 04:27:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-user-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63688 invoked by uid 500); 20 Dec 2012 04:27:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63669 invoked by uid 99); 20 Dec 2012 04:27:46 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 04:27:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ravi@hortonworks.com designates 209.85.212.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vb0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 04:27:41 +0000 Received: by mail-vb0-f48.google.com with SMTP id fc21so3200887vbb.21 for ; Wed, 19 Dec 2012 20:27:20 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=VEuKAtrzbb4gXVxijDNeK3r5SkVZ+xduiWUIn2vXbyU=; b=muYDqIR8yRaADu9Ay41tULI5np1hYJ9S8S9N12X5sIdjbSgT9bkN6wEfjwOTr8QvI+ 6yJplC+Kjmy1JE3Z0a4Y9EY2jRQZmjzsyyZs1+SP/880tdARHa5CTdY2UJfwIc/V1oR3 G3zfwhRPSBykj7IpFKYx60zXWnABTeI2H/6QQmNXNCu2JVcmYMQQceWkNiV7AsVKH6eg UpIIEN+mPwaDApzU+H6DY9UJpSy4NO3LlMm5qMV1GiiETEF7oKnIPn7061OTyUQIzBxZ rm6oeboBRJeSQMgIfTo71TAEY7SritS8YdO5VWD8mtRfuQ6Z1hw/VKx1qFLiBhx782Gj VxKA== Received: by 10.52.90.133 with SMTP id bw5mr11004584vdb.109.1355977640387; Wed, 19 Dec 2012 20:27:20 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.58.67.201 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Dec 2012 20:26:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20121219210120.7098ff60d8000ac98b0356cd27c73871.563df0a606.wbe@email04.secureserver.net> References: <20121219210120.7098ff60d8000ac98b0356cd27c73871.563df0a606.wbe@email04.secureserver.net> From: Ravi Mutyala Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 22:26:40 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: What should I do with a 48-node cluster To: user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf307f374894236104d14125b3 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnsi3qBrE6OJyCyS64wByt59luqW+WvT9P1K6AFRLscQ5FPh/ItssTtyMzEbSsFQiCz0Py6 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --20cf307f374894236104d14125b3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I would install openstack and do all the testing for your product on local cluster. You wont need big network pipes to the WWW for a test cluster, so you need not worry too much about hosting! On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 10:01 PM, Chris Folsom wrote: > > > > Who cares! 48 nodes = 1 node per hour the world has left. Take delivery > now and write a personal check. : ) > > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: What should I do with a 48-node cluster > From: Mark Kerzner > Date: Wed, December 19, 2012 10:35 pm > To: user@hadoop.apache.org > > I am toying with exactly that idea. My startup does Hadoop eDiscovery, > only we usually do it on EC2. Getting down to earth is exciting but > worrying. > > Mark > > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 9:32 PM, Mapred Learn > wrote: > What about investing this cluster in a startup if u hv some > awesomeideas :) > Who knows how much you might gain over next few years :) > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Dec 19, 2012, at 7:29 PM, Mark Kerzner > wrote: > > > Sure, I love hardware, but aren't the hosting costs prohibitively high? > > Mark > > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 9:23 PM, Mohammad Tariq > wrote: > Hello sir, > > If you think the deal fits in your budget, better go for it. It's > just a 1 time investment and provides you more control on your cluster > than AWS. You can get your hands dirty with some config & admin stuff as > well, in case you haven't touched that part yet. But, go for it iff you > are totally confident about the machines and the person you are dealing > with. > > > Best Regards,Tariq > +91-9741563634 > > > > On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Mark Kerzner > wrote: > Hi, > > Someone wants to give me (OK, sell, but for the cheap) a 48-node cluster > of decent blades, a few years old. Should I even thy to think of what to > do with them, given that one can use dedicated servers and Amazon's EC2? > > Thank you. Sincerely, > Mark > --20cf307f374894236104d14125b3 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I would install openstack and do all the testing for your product on local = cluster. You wont need big network pipes to the WWW for a test cluster, so = you need not worry too much about hosting!




On Wed, Dec 1= 9, 2012 at 10:01 PM, Chris Folsom <jcfolsom@pureperfect.com>= wrote:



Who cares! 48 nodes =3D 1 node per hour the world has left. Take delivery now and write a personal check. : )


=A0 -------- Original Message --------
=A0Subject: Re: What should I do with a 48-node cluster
=A0From: Mark Kerzner <mark.= kerzner@shmsoft.com>
=A0Date: Wed, December 19, 2012 10:35 pm
=A0To: user@hadoop.apache.org=

=A0I am toying with exactly that idea. My startup does Hadoop eDiscovery, only we usually do it on EC2. Getting down to earth is exciting but
worrying.

Mark

On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 9:32 PM, Mapred Learn <mapred.learn@gmail.com>
wrote:
=A0What about investing this cluster in a startup if u hv some
awesomeideas :)
Who knows how much you might gain over next few years :)

Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 19, 2012, at 7:29 PM, Mark Kerzner <mark.kerzner@shmsoft.com>
wrote:


=A0Sure, I love hardware, but aren't the hosting costs prohibitively hi= gh?

Mark

On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 9:23 PM, Mohammad Tariq <dontariq@gmail.com>
wrote:
=A0Hello sir,

=A0 =A0 =A0If you think the deal fits in your budget, better go for it. It&= #39;s
just a 1 time investment and provides you more control on your cluster
than AWS. You can get your hands dirty with some config & admin stuff a= s
well, in case you haven't touched that part yet. But, go for it iff you=
are totally confident about the machines and the person you are dealing
with.


Best Regards,Tariq
+91-9741563634=



On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Mark Kerzner <mark.kerzner@shmsoft.com>
wrote:
=A0Hi,

Someone wants to give me (OK, sell, but for the cheap) a 48-node cluster of decent blades, a few years old. Should I even thy to think of what to do with them, given that one can use dedicated servers and Amazon's EC2= ?

Thank you. Sincerely,
Mark

--20cf307f374894236104d14125b3--