Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D91C6D42E for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 22:28:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 60113 invoked by uid 500); 26 Sep 2012 22:28:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-user-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59986 invoked by uid 500); 26 Sep 2012 22:28:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59979 invoked by uid 99); 26 Sep 2012 22:28:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 22:28:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FSL_RCVD_USER,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of silvianhadoop@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.48] (HELO mail-la0-f48.google.com) (209.85.215.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 22:28:47 +0000 Received: by lagu2 with SMTP id u2so179200lag.35 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 15:28:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=XqUqAzziYVCXsjxf8HgmwVYHyNYRnk0miofKkLyN0K8=; b=sgFxFqLKpvlNTfO53hSEVURKE7aD/UMBSGgiRoWxzrTSb0zLIWwK2K7OrkGJYYIVDa ij8Qab5p4qVGwaVeVc2Slf3dlX/fvJRRTPc+KSLg2RIdMlRPnh8vOuyT0EEzOtL+F8aH 4inEJ8+6XQABoWk73PZvB/klrM5fSEAb1nkj9sxpuKWeAzhrMn6Wi2ifUi63CSy1cXuT vd+iKIkbfRL1G2YEtxUfK+HbMh8yHTNpX6dDSoj4uDvOtgTvhrzqAHU89PZfetwPGbu1 OEXdzHrIMkv7Q5J+lW3zzk3wzDdD+eKx3EoxIFzkUeutOjTPQWLBw6pMflvg3XkfHqRz ZR9Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.123.133 with SMTP id ma5mr1797511lab.8.1348698506494; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 15:28:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.11.197 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 15:28:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 15:28:26 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: splitting jobtracker and namenode From: Patai Sangbutsarakum To: user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Thanks Ted, that's true. On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > Why are you changing the TTL on DNS if you aren't moving the name? If you > are just changing the config to a new name, then caching won't matter. > > > On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Patai Sangbutsarakum > wrote: >> >> Hi Hadoopers, >> >> My production Hadoop 0.20.2 cluster has been running Pri. namenode and >> Jobtracker together in the same box for long time. it's time to >> separate them. I am trying to write up a procedure on this to make >> sure that it won't cause any issues. >> >> - Decrease TTL of DNS entry for value of mapred.job.tracker >> - Prepare new name in DNS entry for value of mapred.job.tracker >> - Change value of mapred.job.tracker (in mapred-site.xml) to new >> server and propagate the new config to whole cluster and clients ( >> where Hadoop jobs are submitted from ) >> - Create directory defined in mapred.local.dir on new server. >> - Make sure that new jobtracker server is not in slave or master file. >> - run stop-mapred.sh on current jobtracker server >> - run start-mapred.sh on new jobtracker server >> >> Do I miss anything ? >> >> Please suggest. >> >> Patai > >