hadoop-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Visioner Sadak <visioner.sa...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: WEBHDFS vs HDFSPROXY which one is faster
Date Wed, 19 Sep 2012 21:13:11 GMT
can we read  HAR files frm webhdfs in that case will my url be like

har://http-localhost:50070/webhdfs/v1/HAR/1june2012.har/test.jpg?op=OPEN

but will my browser be able to understand this

On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 2:38 AM, Visioner Sadak <visioner.sadak@gmail.com>wrote:

> Thanks harsh.....
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 8:41 PM, Harsh J <harsh@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> WebHDFS is faster/scalable as it lets the client directly access a DN
>> to read off of, and hence requires that the client be able to access
>> all nodes of the HDFS cluster. The HttpFs (what hdfsproxy is now
>> 'called') is instead useful as a gateway service if clients are not
>> allowed to access all DN nodes of a given cluster.
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Visioner Sadak
>> <visioner.sadak@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hello experts could you judge whether webhdfs is fast or hdfsproxy is
>> fast,
>> > is hdfs proxy slower coz it uses https only or can we use http also in
>> > hdfsproxy, its also mentioned in this below link,could you guys throw
>> more
>> > light on advantages and disadvantages of both techniques......
>> >
>> >
>> http://hadoop.apache.org/docs/hdfs/r0.21.0/hdfsproxy.html#Tomcat-based+Installation+and+Configuration
>> > in disadvantages section,
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks....
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Harsh J
>>
>
>

Mime
View raw message