hadoop-pig-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Pradeep Kamath (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (PIG-1546) Incorrect assert statements in operator evaluation
Date Tue, 17 Aug 2010 20:37:16 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1546?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12899566#action_12899566
] 

Pradeep Kamath commented on PIG-1546:
-------------------------------------

Results from running the "test-patch" ant target
    [exec] +1 overall.
     [exec]
     [exec]     +1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.
     [exec]
     [exec]     +1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests.
     [exec]
     [exec]     +1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.
     [exec]
     [exec]     +1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler
warnings.
     [exec]
     [exec]     +1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings.
     [exec]
     [exec]     +1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of
release audit warnings.


> Incorrect assert statements in operator evaluation
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PIG-1546
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1546
>             Project: Pig
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: impl
>    Affects Versions: 0.7.0
>            Reporter: Ajay Kidave
>            Assignee: Ajay Kidave
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 0.8.0
>
>         Attachments: pig_1546.patch
>
>
> The physical operator evaluation code path for <, <=, > and >= have incorrect
assert statements. These asserts fail if the jvm have asserts enabled.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message