hadoop-pig-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ashutosh Chauhan (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (PIG-928) UDFs in scripting languages
Date Wed, 26 May 2010 00:15:38 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-928?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12871448#action_12871448
] 

Ashutosh Chauhan commented on PIG-928:
--------------------------------------

Arnab,

Thanks for putting together a patch for this. One question I have is about register Vs define.
Currently you are auto-registering all the functions in the script file and then they are
available for later use in script. But I am not sure how we will handle the case for inlined
functions. For inline functions {{define}} seems to be a natural choice as noted in previous
comments of the jira. And if so, then we need to modify define to support that use case. Wondering
to remain consistent, we always use {{define}} to define <non-native> functions instead
of auto registering them. I also didn't get why there will be need for separate interpreter
instances in that case.


> UDFs in scripting languages
> ---------------------------
>
>                 Key: PIG-928
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-928
>             Project: Pig
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Alan Gates
>             Fix For: 0.8.0
>
>         Attachments: calltrace.png, package.zip, pig-greek.tgz, pig.scripting.patch.arnab,
pyg.tgz, scripting.tgz, scripting.tgz, test.zip
>
>
> It should be possible to write UDFs in scripting languages such as python, ruby, etc.
 This frees users from needing to compile Java, generate a jar, etc.  It also opens Pig to
programmers who prefer scripting languages over Java.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message