hadoop-pig-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "hc busy (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Created: (PIG-1387) Syntactical Sugar for PIG-1385
Date Wed, 21 Apr 2010 05:14:49 GMT
Syntactical Sugar for PIG-1385
------------------------------

                 Key: PIG-1387
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1387
             Project: Pig
          Issue Type: Wish
          Components: grunt
    Affects Versions: 0.6.0
            Reporter: hc busy


>From this conversation, extend PIG-1385 to instead of calling UDF use built-in behavior
when the (),{},[] groupings are encountered.


> > What about making them part of the language using symbols?
> >
> > instead of
> >
> > foreach T generate Tuple($0, $1, $2), Bag($3, $4, $5), $6, $7;
> >
> > have language support
> >
> > foreach T generate ($0, $1, $2), {$3, $4, $5}, $6, $7;
> >
> > or even:
> >
> > foreach T generate ($0, $1, $2), {$3, $4, $5}, [$6#$7, $8#$9], $10, $11;
> >
> >
> > Is there reason not to do the second or third other than being more
> > complicated?
> >
> > Certainly I'd volunteer to put the top implementation in to the util
> > package and submit them for builtin's, but the latter syntactic candies
> > seems more natural..
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Alan Gates <gates@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
> >
> >> The grouping package in piggybank is left over from back when Pig
> allowed
> >> users to define grouping functions (0.1).  Functions like these should
> go in
> >> evaluation.util.
> >>
> >> However, I'd consider putting these in builtin (in main Pig) instead.
> >>  These are things everyone asks for and they seem like a reasonable
> addition
> >> to the core engine.  This will be more of a burden to write (as we'll
> hold
> >> them to a higher standard) but of more use to people as well.
> >>
> >> Alan.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Apr 19, 2010, at 12:53 PM, hc busy wrote:
> >>
> >>  Some times I wonder... I mean, somebody went to the trouble of making a
> >>> path
> >>> called
> >>>
> >>> org.apache.pig.piggybank.grouping
> >>>
> >>> (where it seems like this code belong), but didn't check in any java
> code
> >>> into that package.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Any comment about where to put this kind of utility classes?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Andrey S <octo47@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>  2010/4/19 hc busy <hc.busy@gmail.com>
> >>>>
> >>>>  That's just the way it is right now, you can't make bags or tuples
> >>>>> directly... Maybe we should have some UDF's in piggybank for these:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> toBag()
> >>>>> toTuple(); --which is kinda like exec(Tuple in){return in;}
> >>>>> TupleToBag(); --some times you need it this way for some reason.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>  Ok. I place my current code here, may be later I make a patch (if
> such
> >>>> implementation is acceptable of course).
> >>>>
> >>>> import org.apache.pig.EvalFunc;
> >>>> import org.apache.pig.data.BagFactory;
> >>>> import org.apache.pig.data.DataBag;
> >>>> import org.apache.pig.data.Tuple;
> >>>> import org.apache.pig.data.TupleFactory;
> >>>>
> >>>> import java.io.IOException;
> >>>>
> >>>> /**
> >>>> * Convert any sequence of fields to bag with specified count of
> >>>> fields<br>
> >>>> * Schema: count:int, fld1 [, fld2, fld3, fld4... ].
> >>>> * Output: count=2, then { (fld1, fld2) , (fld3, fld4) ... }
> >>>> *
> >>>> * @author astepachev
> >>>> */
> >>>> public class ToBag extends EvalFunc<DataBag> {
> >>>>  public BagFactory bagFactory;
> >>>>  public TupleFactory tupleFactory;
> >>>>
> >>>>  public ToBag() {
> >>>>      bagFactory = BagFactory.getInstance();
> >>>>      tupleFactory = TupleFactory.getInstance();
> >>>>  }
> >>>>
> >>>>  @Override
> >>>>  public DataBag exec(Tuple input) throws IOException {
> >>>>      if (input.isNull())
> >>>>          return null;
> >>>>      final DataBag bag = bagFactory.newDefaultBag();
> >>>>      final Integer couter = (Integer) input.get(0);
> >>>>      if (couter == null)
> >>>>          return null;
> >>>>      Tuple tuple = tupleFactory.newTuple();
> >>>>      for (int i = 0; i < input.size() - 1; i++) {
> >>>>          if (i % couter == 0) {
> >>>>              tuple = tupleFactory.newTuple();
> >>>>              bag.add(tuple);
> >>>>          }
> >>>>          tuple.append(input.get(i + 1));
> >>>>      }
> >>>>      return bag;
> >>>>  }
> >>>> }
> >>>>
> >>>> import org.apache.pig.ExecType;
> >>>> import org.apache.pig.PigServer;
> >>>> import org.junit.Before;
> >>>> import org.junit.Test;
> >>>>
> >>>> import java.io.IOException;
> >>>> import java.net.URISyntaxException;
> >>>> import java.net.URL;
> >>>>
> >>>> import static org.junit.Assert.assertTrue;
> >>>>
> >>>> /**
> >>>> * @author astepachev
> >>>> */
> >>>> public class ToBagTest {
> >>>>  PigServer pigServer;
> >>>>  URL inputTxt;
> >>>>
> >>>>  @Before
> >>>>  public void init() throws IOException, URISyntaxException {
> >>>>      pigServer = new PigServer(ExecType.LOCAL);
> >>>>      inputTxt =
> >>>> this.getClass().getResource("bagTest.txt").toURI().toURL();
> >>>>  }
> >>>>
> >>>>  @Test
> >>>>  public void testSimple() throws IOException {
> >>>>      pigServer.registerQuery("a = load '" + inputTxt.toExternalForm()
> +
> >>>> "' using PigStorage(',') " +
> >>>>              "as (id:int, a:chararray, b:chararray, c:chararray,
> >>>> d:chararray);");
> >>>>      pigServer.registerQuery("last = foreach a generate flatten(" +
> >>>> ToBag.class.getName() + "(2, id, a, id, b, id, c));");
> >>>>
> >>>>      pigServer.deleteFile("target/pigtest/func1.txt");
> >>>>      pigServer.store("last", "target/pigtest/func1.txt");
> >>>>      assertTrue(pigServer.fileSize("target/pigtest/func1.txt") >
0);
> >>>>  }
> >>>> }
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >
>


-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message