hadoop-pig-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Olga Natkovich (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (PIG-297) RM a non-existing file should not fail the script
Date Thu, 24 Jul 2008 00:32:31 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12616315#action_12616315
] 

Olga Natkovich commented on PIG-297:
------------------------------------

It is fine either way - I just was not sure if you intended to use it but then forgot to change
code.

Also, I assume that this patch is to be applied to the trunk. Is this correct?

> RM a non-existing file should not fail the script
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PIG-297
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-297
>             Project: Pig
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: grunt
>            Reporter: Yiping Han
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: PIG-297.patch, PIG-297v2.patch
>
>
> rm is commonly used to remove the existing output before re-execute a script. However,
when the output is not existing, rm will fail and grunt will terminate the execution. Such
a behavior is  very inconvenience. Expected grunt behavior would print some error message
and continue to execute the script.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message