Return-Path: 
 <user-return-16159-apmail-hadoop-mapreduce-user-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-mapreduce-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-mapreduce-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9EC9511A3B
	for <apmail-hadoop-mapreduce-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org>;
 Tue, 15 Jul 2014 08:52:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 89635 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2014 08:52:03 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-mapreduce-user-archive@hadoop.apache.org
Received: (qmail 89530 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2014 08:52:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact user-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:user-help@hadoop.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:user-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:user@hadoop.apache.org>
List-Id: <user.hadoop.apache.org>
Reply-To: user@hadoop.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list user@hadoop.apache.org
Received: (qmail 89520 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2014 08:52:03 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 08:52:03 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=5.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of shanira14@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.220.177 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.220.177] (HELO mail-vc0-f177.google.com)
 (209.85.220.177)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 08:51:58 +0000
Received: by mail-vc0-f177.google.com with SMTP id hy4so2798908vcb.36
        for <user@hadoop.apache.org>; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 01:51:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=ceAjpBthMhtjjsK8qMpB2/HPLB5Y/v1VhCdBZZ1nWfw=;
        b=cIdbXJv1CWRKQRblHJgmerAxfIQOzgaB8Ebad389/K194rIc7lmDXXiI4lKrdPp4i3
         HnnqmYgSLRb0uASF0d3mJMvs1/g3jqe9NeRlocrnseAy4zy/D//QItEaJUu8OBO/gqKL
         mdQ/eatBMsnyf+RD/HByELpaquW44HCeosGGOPBzkuCCvfCD4sFMEOWdggNI8iFUnJom
         8lGT+nAzbUO1siRjF+TVcxD0Xd1ho9fs80dyPMOu/NSZ1HBtSqye8EDy7t0jF/X4x06v
         /KPttmXg2cuQBm4bPkh5XKGXngmQY2wkhN2mXfsdKfWMOI+PvLXPZBIh5EIZP04kyAVR
         KUPg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.58.188.199 with SMTP id gc7mr20932988vec.4.1405414297319;
 Tue, 15 Jul 2014 01:51:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.161.134 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 01:51:37 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: 
 <CABTow_dJgpS7wG-_6ktREARCvEwACNyQg7gqutceAVpyYWGGtw@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CABTow_dJgpS7wG-_6ktREARCvEwACNyQg7gqutceAVpyYWGGtw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 14:21:37 +0530
Message-ID: 
 <CABTow_d=rU+_DDR7349ZELjo4Qc9u=1L6H+BX81iHRANLjxR5w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Fwd: Is hadoop 2.4.1 for HDFS recommended for production?
From: Shani Ranasinghe <shanira14@gmail.com>
To: user@hadoop.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b5db99ef4418c04fe3783e1
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

--047d7b5db99ef4418c04fe3783e1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi,

I am planning to use hadoop 2.4.1 for my work, and was wondering if it is
recommended for production? If not should I use the 2.2.0 GA release?

WDYT?

Regards,
Shani Ranasinghe.

--047d7b5db99ef4418c04fe3783e1
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8

<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr"><div><div>Hi, <br><br>I am planning to use hadoop 2.4.1 for my work, and was wondering if it is recommended for production? If not should I use the 2.2.0 GA release?<br>
<br></div><div>WDYT?<br></div><div><br>
</div>Regards,<br></div>Shani Ranasinghe.<br></div>
</div><br></div>

--047d7b5db99ef4418c04fe3783e1--