Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-mapreduce-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-mapreduce-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6711310520 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 18:41:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30430 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2014 18:41:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-mapreduce-user-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30251 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2014 18:41:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30244 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2014 18:40:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 18:40:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jayunit100@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.50 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.50] (HELO mail-la0-f50.google.com) (209.85.215.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 18:40:53 +0000 Received: by mail-la0-f50.google.com with SMTP id ec20so6184136lab.37 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:40:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=KH0S//6q0X6mKWW4jwYH0irb+81gb4V8woBtZybB2Rs=; b=oF1N4+cWyuyxn0335h+n+RpPKumJxckYDAGpx6748sAi4+3eC3d25HGCDiBTTBQngJ 1qbP0fxOCsFFMkcfxvd26EAajVCk7bRMInIl2dpmpPYdX3zQJowz50dLjU6pKyRtafix Iw1oV1TIkZZYxe3Vm6nySQ8ngKHLPL/RB/qDBJ2ka0DacJcWuTcer5OcQSJvTogSQFTZ N5lwz92QurDmXwg7bfSzJ7pZhn5PbiMT99KQjIqkqsF6EXZRmoYX3wwsQQ+l+BH2Od0h LSQZwZk77sdZpmrCiBkUn6CXrERIQoP/7S2XI7/GZNKB81ZatZ9Kiuae1iQHFVM9UJrd qA/w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.56.237 with SMTP id d13mr26631441lbq.2.1392144033413; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:40:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.143.229 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:40:33 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 13:40:33 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: YARN FSDownload: How did Mr1 do it ? From: Jay Vyas To: "common-user@hadoop.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1133a92296811404f225ca68 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a1133a92296811404f225ca68 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Im noticing that resource localization is much more complex in YARN than MR1, in particular, the timestamps need to be identical, or else, an exception is thrown. i never saw that in MR1. How did MR1 JobTrackers handle resource localization differently than MR2 App Masters? -- Jay Vyas http://jayunit100.blogspot.com --001a1133a92296811404f225ca68 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Im noticing that resource localization is much more c= omplex in YARN than MR1, in particular, the timestamps need to be identical= , or else, an exception is thrown.

i never saw that in MR1.= =A0

How did MR1 JobTrackers handle resource localization differently than M= R2 App Masters?
--001a1133a92296811404f225ca68--