Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-mapreduce-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-mapreduce-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0EA2910E8B for ; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 11:16:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 96355 invoked by uid 500); 9 Nov 2013 11:16:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-mapreduce-user-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95882 invoked by uid 500); 9 Nov 2013 11:16:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95875 invoked by uid 99); 9 Nov 2013 11:15:59 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 09 Nov 2013 11:15:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of unmeshabiju@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.42 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.42] (HELO mail-vb0-f42.google.com) (209.85.212.42) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 09 Nov 2013 11:15:55 +0000 Received: by mail-vb0-f42.google.com with SMTP id p14so2137364vbm.29 for ; Sat, 09 Nov 2013 03:15:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=Lb/0R1q5Kt9t9unNXkj0sGqVXY5HJyOe22kX0iKxK24=; b=pX/du+vthW5hygPSZiACGoQvEM1bwkxwNMrgHBvwukTJSngvJnAeVK0Qr9qtCFdUqz G1W2PLriqV/qATq9pszM1ZVLJVLH7gRgAYkJHhzTzXetgWwMX9aSg1cxcDAyyAQTNyaS mo9CVoZC1PLdYrBniqF0tlKmWuhUPX1Vl/oK228IEbfhXBjHMkoxIn4PTqIeGNlxg+mF 6XuI6pHAQbqnFKe7mC/K6SOCtmXFz2oEoXofDB40qHwN664c36GyLD9D9rJ3c1Rq4Sqp hiPoBvyKvR+eG/8cnUiLN8SnbYxs9uoLBg4JlIMtDG2cJ8WNXkMpSHuN76h8w1gCiByA KwXw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.58.143.17 with SMTP id sa17mr15957173veb.14.1383995734866; Sat, 09 Nov 2013 03:15:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.59.8.2 with HTTP; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 03:15:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <2868212E-DF9F-442D-BD08-49F84B4D4799@xense.co.uk> References: <2868212E-DF9F-442D-BD08-49F84B4D4799@xense.co.uk> Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2013 16:45:34 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: SVM implementaion From: unmesha sreeveni To: User Hadoop Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b6d95ee25c19404eabc9e2d X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --047d7b6d95ee25c19404eabc9e2d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 1/-1 is not available? On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 7:58 PM, Robin East wrote: > You could try having a look at some of the competition data sets on > http://www.kaggle.com. Many of them are 1/0 classification problems > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 8 Nov 2013, at 10:10, unmesha sreeveni wrote: > > where can i get a large file for checking svm .with classes 1 and -1 > around 1 GB file > > > On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 11:14 AM, unmesha sreeveni = wrote: > >> thx Mirko Kampf >> >> >> On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Mirko K=E4mpf w= rote: >> >>> There are three Jira issues about it: Mahout-14 >>> and Mahout-334 have >>> been closed as won't fix. Mahout-232 was >>> assigned later because some code was contributed early (2009) but it di= d >>> not work so it was not incorporated into Mahout. Since then Mahout has >>> changed, so porting the code would be difficult, and if you look at the >>> issue there is some disagreement about whether it approaches the proble= m in >>> the best way. >>> >>> There is some code for a cascadeSVM implementation but >>> the training part - the hard part - was never published. >>> >>> There is a parallel SVM implementation that >>> runs on MPI rather than Hadoop. >>> >>> This San Francisco Meetup abstract has >>> some discussion of current state of the art and issues for parallel SVM= . >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> 2013/11/8 unmesha sreeveni >>> >>>> Do we have an SVM implementation? >>>> >>>> -- >>>> *Thanks & Regards* >>>> >>>> Unmesha Sreeveni U.B >>>> >>>> *Junior Developer* >>>> >>>> *Amrita Center For Cyber Security * >>>> >>>> >>>> * Amritapuri.www.amrita.edu/cyber/ * >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> *Thanks & Regards* >> >> Unmesha Sreeveni U.B >> >> *Junior Developer* >> >> *Amrita Center For Cyber Security * >> >> >> * Amritapuri.www.amrita.edu/cyber/ * >> > > > > -- > *Thanks & Regards* > > Unmesha Sreeveni U.B > > *Junior Developer* > > *Amrita Center For Cyber Security * > > > * Amritapuri.www.amrita.edu/cyber/ * > > --=20 *Thanks & Regards* Unmesha Sreeveni U.B *Junior Developer* *Amrita Center For Cyber Security* * Amritapuri.www.amrita.edu/cyber/ * --047d7b6d95ee25c19404eabc9e2d Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
1/-1 is not available?


On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 7:58 PM, Robin = East <robin.east@xense.co.uk> wrote:
You could try having = a look at some of the competition data sets on http://www.kaggle.com. Many of them are 1/0 cla= ssification problems

Sent from my iPhone

On 8 Nov 2013,= at 10:10, unmesha sreeveni <unmeshabiju@gmail.com> wrote:

where can i get a large file for checking svm .with classe= s 1 and -1
around 1 GB file


On Fri,= Nov 8, 2013 at 11:14 AM, unmesha sreeveni <unmeshabiju@gmail.com&= gt; wrote:
thx Mirko Kampf


On Fri, = Nov 8, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Mirko K=E4mpf <mirko.kaempf@gmail.com>= ; wrote:

There are three Jira issues about it:=A0Mahout-14=A0and=A0Mahout-334=A0have been closed as won't fix.=A0Ma= hout-232=A0was assigned later because some code was contributed early (= 2009) but it did not work so it was not incorporated into Mahout. Since the= n Mahout has changed, so porting the code would be difficult, and if you lo= ok at the issue there is some disagreement about whether it approaches the = problem in the best way.

There is=A0some code for a cascadeSVM implementation=A0but the trainin= g part - the hard part - was never published.

There is a=A0parallel SVM implementation=A0that runs on MPI rather than Hadoo= p.

This San Francisco Meetup abstract=A0has some dis= cussion of current state of the art and issues for parallel SVM.





2013/11/8 unmesha sreeveni <unmeshabiju@gmail.com>
Do we have an SVM implementation?

--
Thanks & Regards

Unmesha Sreeveni U.B
Junior Developer
Amrita Center For Cyber Security




--
=
Thanks & Regards

Unmesha Sreeveni U.B
Junior Developer
Amrita Center For Cyber Security



--
=
Thanks & Regards

Unmesha Sreeveni U.B
Junior Developer
Amrita Center For Cyber Security



--
Thanks &= Regards

Unmesha Sreeveni U.B
Junior Developer
Amrita Center For Cyber Security
--047d7b6d95ee25c19404eabc9e2d--