hadoop-mapreduce-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mirko Kämpf <mirko.kae...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: SVM implementaion
Date Fri, 08 Nov 2013 05:18:02 GMT
There are three Jira issues about it:
Mahout-14<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-14>
 and Mahout-334 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-334> have
been closed as won't fix.
Mahout-232<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-232> was
assigned later because some code was contributed early (2009) but it did
not work so it was not incorporated into Mahout. Since then Mahout has
changed, so porting the code would be difficult, and if you look at the
issue there is some disagreement about whether it approaches the problem in
the best way.

There is some code for a cascadeSVM
implementation<https://code.google.com/p/cascadesvm/> but
the training part - the hard part - was never published.

There is a parallel SVM implementation <https://code.google.com/p/psvm/> that
runs on MPI rather than Hadoop.

This San Francisco Meetup
abstract<http://www.meetup.com/sfmachinelearning/events/116497192/>
has
some discussion of current state of the art and issues for parallel SVM.





2013/11/8 unmesha sreeveni <unmeshabiju@gmail.com>

> Do we have an SVM implementation?
>
> --
> *Thanks & Regards*
>
> Unmesha Sreeveni U.B
>
> *Junior Developer*
>
> *Amrita Center For Cyber Security *
>
>
> * Amritapuri.www.amrita.edu/cyber/ <http://www.amrita.edu/cyber/>*
>

Mime
View raw message