hadoop-mapreduce-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Patai Sangbutsarakum <Patai.Sangbutsara...@turn.com>
Subject Re: Java version with Hadoop 2.0
Date Wed, 09 Oct 2013 22:57:25 GMT
Does that mean for the new cluster, we probably try to start to aim to test/use/deploy at java
7?


On Oct 9, 2013, at 3:05 PM, Andre Kelpe <akelpe@concurrentinc.com>
 wrote:

> also keep in mind, that java 6 no longer gets "public" updates from
> Oracle: http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/eol-135779.html
> 
> - André
> 
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 11:48 PM, SF Hadoop <sfhadoop@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I hadn't.  Thank you!!!  Very helpful.
>> 
>> Andy
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Patai Sangbutsarakum
>> <Patai.Sangbutsarakum@turn.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> maybe you've already seen this.
>>> 
>>> http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HadoopJavaVersions
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Oct 9, 2013, at 2:16 PM, SF Hadoop <sfhadoop@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I am preparing to deploy multiple cluster / distros of Hadoop for testing
>>> / benchmarking.
>>> 
>>> In my research I have noticed discrepancies in the version of the JDK that
>>> various groups are using.  Example:  Hortonworks is suggesting JDK6u31, CDH
>>> recommends either 6 or 7 providing you stick to some guidelines for each and
>>> Apache Hadoop seems to be somewhat of a "no mans land"; a lot of people
>>> using a lot of different versions.
>>> 
>>> Does anyone have any insight they could share about how to approach
>>> choosing the best JDK release?  (I'm a total Java newb, so any info /
>>> further reading you guys can provide is appreciated.)
>>> 
>>> Thanks.
>>> 
>>> sf
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> André Kelpe
> andre@concurrentinc.com
> http://concurrentinc.com


Mime
View raw message