Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-mapreduce-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-mapreduce-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EC9C210B5D for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 03:06:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8679 invoked by uid 500); 13 Aug 2013 03:06:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-mapreduce-user-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8572 invoked by uid 500); 13 Aug 2013 03:06:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8565 invoked by uid 99); 13 Aug 2013 03:06:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 03:06:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of harsh@cloudera.com designates 209.85.223.182 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.182] (HELO mail-ie0-f182.google.com) (209.85.223.182) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 03:06:08 +0000 Received: by mail-ie0-f182.google.com with SMTP id tp5so9766839ieb.13 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 20:05:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=GPfCe2spMT2OhB/lVUfp4totSQ/fO5e6TPAB5s1qGc4=; b=eQZFby+3sz44s0xU3C3Lop4I1XMsD6j8v3/8cSutpFUh7lVZS6ythvAc8iqII1k6Tz OpLrK+x6AwxhKqO6VLe9gjV98x4tSDk2lvGZ46HEc14DVtvXKUBZkTYUaCerSa+CHaEZ XAX+AFiCRxFZeXFXHaB1HUyVqJv0mpwCcHGkAJuN2xVfgmgd8PCbmBceV0k94nyYPkOm ouwGV9iK04uR3S+I6AozONxAztwQpvvhZ0ntqxn8YYZ8aW2vS/YxmloeKsM6pCcm5xJu B90dsOr5LMR6xRH0yaQK1cx2NvOVsPEIWSroseo/c+bUjpNWpvojrO6xBG5rbCr5vw0K hzJg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmzoO0kU/5QiSOdZbImOZB7osMeNI92jfQo4yknxFmYEQxf5iYEdnCoOSH+MNm2KmmRtE/i X-Received: by 10.50.44.35 with SMTP id b3mr1288030igm.7.1376363148220; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 20:05:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.95.199 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 20:05:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Harsh J Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 08:35:28 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: when Standby Namenode is doing checkpoint, the Active NameNode is slow. To: "" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org How large are your checkpointed fsimage files? On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 3:42 PM, lei liu wrote: > When Standby Namenode is doing checkpoint, upload the image file to Active > NameNode, the Active NameNode is very slow. What is reason result to the > Active NameNode is slow? > > > Thanks, > > LiuLei > -- Harsh J