Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-mapreduce-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-mapreduce-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A95D0DEE0 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 13:49:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 54850 invoked by uid 500); 19 Sep 2012 13:49:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-mapreduce-user-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54729 invoked by uid 500); 19 Sep 2012 13:49:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54719 invoked by uid 99); 19 Sep 2012 13:49:01 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 13:49:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FSL_RCVD_USER,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_OBFUSCATE_05_10,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of visioner.sadak@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.176] (HELO mail-ey0-f176.google.com) (209.85.215.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 13:48:54 +0000 Received: by eabd1 with SMTP id d1so376053eab.35 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 06:48:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=y4PIJ0Z1KPTn9rvrLzUZfVODRymqpEy/DYZKvwJHh7I=; b=cenq2GRALAlX5EGPVquPMywuYiGzWWwwEFicUZchjfoOO63m5b5wSlBExJodIRC9b5 91BFGCVYbtP12cMPHI5nP/s2CK/ZMXYzdpGJOTrnHCtQwFkw+wqvO2KSKtVnMZqG+HhR UWMttHD5/+GDwflJ9rJ0oVYMeRP7NCbipnQ9NVdJZCTZihDJWHY7zo6hyX2Oljln8JTy xkKQf4NKHmIa6NK6TU1Wzk8t/kinnWYe30SkicZ1QiD/Fwtp41xkIxgnQhHgJvFXJl2Z nBNUEns2GCMa+j9GF/i14r56DQwiWRsRYmswmKoH8Du/3OwR1i+u/b1fW9nAaL5Xi8NU sI1w== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.0.198 with SMTP id 46mr3682532eeb.30.1348062513496; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 06:48:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.220.134 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 06:48:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 19:18:33 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: WEBHDFS vs HDFSPROXY which one is faster From: Visioner Sadak To: user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b62275e40812b04ca0e4353 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --047d7b62275e40812b04ca0e4353 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hello experts could you judge whether webhdfs is fast or hdfsproxy is fast, is hdfs proxy slower coz it uses https only or can we use http also in hdfsproxy, its also mentioned in this below link,could you guys throw more light on advantages and disadvantages of both techniques...... http://hadoop.apache.org/docs/hdfs/r0.21.0/hdfsproxy.html#Tomcat-based+Installation+and+Configuration in disadvantages section, Thanks.... --047d7b62275e40812b04ca0e4353 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello experts could you judge whether webhdfs is fast or hdfsproxy is = fast, =A0is hdfs proxy slower coz it uses https only or can we use http als= o in hdfsproxy, its also mentioned in this below link,could you guys throw = more light on advantages and disadvantages of both techniques......
=A0
=A0
=A0
=A0
Thanks....
--047d7b62275e40812b04ca0e4353--