Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-mapreduce-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-mapreduce-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0251AACA for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 13:48:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 29507 invoked by uid 500); 28 Aug 2012 13:48:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-mapreduce-user-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29391 invoked by uid 500); 28 Aug 2012 13:48:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29384 invoked by uid 99); 28 Aug 2012 13:48:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 13:48:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FSL_RCVD_USER,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of harsh@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-ob0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 13:48:04 +0000 Received: by obbtb18 with SMTP id tb18so9513519obb.35 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 06:47:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=ciLaC36QrDXCzKtmQTs3zJ7i2t7xMegdafD864Txj34=; b=jpc5ksrI1/prQvcEiiHzlRb26wbPOESvIDQUj1EjgZe7crF1oUtlaNGfYbreSy1K36 1W6ocsBoK/eWHHZb2v4/Y52de1DFWtio4pzYnAoi9TrLtvNMIaqqP6IORW4EhzhFx0dI uGBj1cUt0kDzHI7lEDbqTrmNZE+XkQKtjGoFeLUhwYXpcW6I8jGblJReNN6PCUCAdJVi +k7VKn9JJBxiKS4eYHguoj9tsBm2BYvzMnVdhoetff8N2ys7aWOFphxuU4rYJVv56UXZ K416duApZI6Kf55po2N7FLKxhbso6gfuAqGfeiXQvaTGge9jobl+xh5oRO7xjPgXSdPG V/XA== Received: by 10.60.9.134 with SMTP id z6mr11637930oea.90.1346161663180; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 06:47:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.76.11.168 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 06:47:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Harsh J Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 19:17:23 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Job does not run with EOFException To: user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnQU2hakjs7R2JaediOSctPLfZMWmb1LIW+R7ElfEtEBZoS+gH9U9iljuWhxeGatzLvZ3Uz Are you sure you're reaching the right port for your JobTrcker? On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Caetano Sauer wrote: > Hello, > > I am getting the following error when trying to execute a hadoop job on a > 5-node cluster: > > Caused by: java.io.IOException: Call to *** failed on local exception: > java.io.EOFException > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.wrapException(Client.java:1103) > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.call(Client.java:1071) > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Invoker.invoke(RPC.java:225) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.$Proxy2.submitJob(Unknown Source) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobClient$2.run(JobClient.java:921) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobClient$2.run(JobClient.java:850) > at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) > at javax.security.auth.Subject.doAs(Subject.java:396) > at > org.apache.hadoop.security.UserGroupInformation.doAs(UserGroupInformation.java:1093) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobClient.submitJobInternal(JobClient.java:850) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.Job.submit(Job.java:500) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.Job.waitForCompletion(Job.java:530) > ... 9 more > Caused by: java.io.EOFException > at java.io.DataInputStream.readInt(DataInputStream.java:375) > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.receiveResponse(Client.java:800) > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.run(Client.java:745) > > (My jobtracker host was substituted by ***) > > After 3 hours of searching, everything points to an incompatibility between > the hadoop versions of the client and the server, but this is not the case, > since I can run the job on a pseudo-distributed setup on a different > machine. Both are running the exact same version (same svn revision and > source checksum). > > Does anyone have a solution or a suggestion on how to find more debug > information? > > Thank you in advance, > Caetano Sauer -- Harsh J