Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-mapreduce-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-mapreduce-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1AFB03E02 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 09:21:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 47039 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 09:21:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-mapreduce-user-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46988 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 09:21:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact mapreduce-user-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46980 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 09:21:09 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 09:21:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of barancakici@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.169] (HELO mail-qy0-f169.google.com) (209.85.216.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 09:21:01 +0000 Received: by qyk2 with SMTP id 2so3027790qyk.14 for ; Wed, 04 May 2011 02:20:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=vXcJY4lwMX+b6bgpoeyi9yUuN/VGP3+PmJBmtvbsIls=; b=T1ObbmJZfFfUCkn4xoa5ikXmjcbUn8aO6PwgdrAC2x6O3Jzfu9oCAnG082VKD9g+T+ 0ysIkx5OFC2I2koEqyCguZp4heGNHs6494Ev+U+aEkA3ESdFXrvbBkT7mbxEGppWLy4i J5LpkJAjUojkPNmwvTvTlEd6RIEpWUxWctlJs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=hu7GYpGYFJLAOTlRA+xmdJTcOsjpKZg8P0foGywEcPd79YHv6BJw5nIN7rUqRLcS47 rWTQUGdDOKVEvhgi2o23ElB4qbkd/klZQFWLiA4+3zVCiHAOBQVVcYXDz/oh6pjzKdpU AHhETr3D7ZYihxNAYyqK+6oUxyCZiW+p+VY8Y= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.105.71 with SMTP id s7mr564526qco.23.1304500840695; Wed, 04 May 2011 02:20:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.77.165 with HTTP; Wed, 4 May 2011 02:20:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4DC03BB9.8090201@gmail.com> References: <4DBF5F11.607@gmail.com> <4DC03BB9.8090201@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 11:20:40 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Configuration for small Cluster From: baran cakici To: mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=002354470aa838093604a26fc516 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --002354470aa838093604a26fc516 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi, Actually it is not about security level of Linux. They use some Application for Security that just with Windows compatible, it was about that. I am not against to Linux too :) Regards, Baran 2011/5/3 hadoopman > I would dispute the assertion that linux isn't secure. I'm an MCSE and > AIX Unix certified. I can setup windows servers that are very secure > (and in secure). The same thing goes for Unix and Linux servers. > Depends who's hands are on the keyboard imo :D > > If it was me, I would replace the celerons and increase ram. Windows > likes more hardware when improving performance. Also anything that uses > emulation or creates an application layer (like cygwin or wine) I > wouldn't expect anything that borders on performance. Sure there are > tweaks that can be made however it still will be shy of what can be > pulled out of a system (again imo). > > Good Luck with it. > > > > > On 05/03/2011 04:12 AM, baran cakici wrote: > >> Hi, >> I make this System at Work. For the Security Reasons I cant use Linux at >> the Company. They prefer to use Windows. >> thanks, >> Baran >> >> > --002354470aa838093604a26fc516 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
=C2=A0
Actually it is not about security level of Linux. They use some Applic= ation for Security that just with Windows=C2=A0compatible, it was about tha= t. I am not against to Linux too :)
=C2=A0
Regards,
=C2=A0
Baran

2011/5/3 hadoopman <hadoopman@gmail.com>
I would dispute the assertion th= at linux isn't secure. =C2=A0I'm an MCSE and
AIX Unix certified.= =C2=A0I can setup windows servers that are very secure
(and in secure). =C2=A0The same thing goes for Unix and Linux servers.
D= epends who's hands are on the keyboard imo :D

If it was me, I wo= uld replace the celerons and increase ram. =C2=A0Windows
likes more hard= ware when improving performance. =C2=A0Also anything that uses
emulation or creates an application layer (like cygwin or wine) I
wouldn= 't expect anything that borders on performance. =C2=A0Sure there aretweaks that can be made however it still will be shy of what can be
pul= led out of a system (again imo).

Good Luck with it.=20




On 05/03/2011 04:12 AM, baran cakici wrot= e:
Hi,
I make this System at Wor= k. For the Security Reasons I cant use Linux at the Company. They prefer to= use Windows.
thanks,
Baran


--002354470aa838093604a26fc516--