Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-mapreduce-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-mapreduce-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 84CA028DA for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 17:31:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 6703 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 17:31:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-mapreduce-user-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6655 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 17:31:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact mapreduce-user-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6647 invoked by uid 99); 3 May 2011 17:31:06 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 17:31:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of hadoopman@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.174 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.174] (HELO mail-px0-f174.google.com) (209.85.212.174) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 17:30:57 +0000 Received: by pxi15 with SMTP id 15so220533pxi.33 for ; Tue, 03 May 2011 10:30:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=aGmdM5d+dtony71S7sXAqzEopAnG03wbDM3reAfAh8k=; b=S22xZbOrzHbBTRFx2E62MPk+/8VTGYZyUTBJBHKi9wceJL4uB4z15mpiwjSy/7N0oD tUjKHTxByebUU7Dmzo+/PvvQvvJzRUZcrNsqhLjgeELMeUGb7j61HiuTSAdGlTwoscuN lM2leD01ouz6iCoI0MisCr7nVCSYmKpEpRqBo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=cvldyTzVx+hmjCB/UOp/i23cFzZ4sF44tjcewDOi+Cf63SOL2X3CyEi3JXqLsPBCsM eSO1i6uiVYCC+0lzTs5uFa5o1a3Jr3sY8Fkv0wKtJJvBsjd48GnmVRJeskWQSST9ivi7 Ud22/mGEigGgAS6Sxl4rRVjYGXjIFkzH/vftY= Received: by 10.142.178.4 with SMTP id a4mr63426wff.13.1304443836552; Tue, 03 May 2011 10:30:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.20.20.233] (u235sentinel.dsl.xmission.com [166.70.240.70]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x11sm328186wfd.1.2011.05.03.10.30.35 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 03 May 2011 10:30:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4DC03BB9.8090201@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 11:30:33 -0600 From: hadoopman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100713 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Configuration for small Cluster References: <4DBF5F11.607@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I would dispute the assertion that linux isn't secure. I'm an MCSE and AIX Unix certified. I can setup windows servers that are very secure (and in secure). The same thing goes for Unix and Linux servers. Depends who's hands are on the keyboard imo :D If it was me, I would replace the celerons and increase ram. Windows likes more hardware when improving performance. Also anything that uses emulation or creates an application layer (like cygwin or wine) I wouldn't expect anything that borders on performance. Sure there are tweaks that can be made however it still will be shy of what can be pulled out of a system (again imo). Good Luck with it. On 05/03/2011 04:12 AM, baran cakici wrote: > Hi, > I make this System at Work. For the Security Reasons I cant use Linux > at the Company. They prefer to use Windows. > thanks, > Baran >