[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14734959#comment-14734959
]
Jagadesh Kiran N commented on MAPREDUCE-6468:
---------------------------------------------
thanks [~ozawa] for your review, I have updated the patch, Please review , no change required
for ProtobufRpcEngine.java file .
> Consistent log severity level guards and statements in MapReduce project
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MAPREDUCE-6468
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6468
> Project: Hadoop Map/Reduce
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Jackie Chang
> Assignee: Jagadesh Kiran N
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: BB2015-05-TBR
> Attachments: HADOOP-9995-00.patch, HADOOP-9995.patch, MAPREDUCE-6468-01.patch,
MAPREDUCE-6468-02.patch
>
>
> Developers use logs to do in-house debugging. These log statements are later demoted
to less severe levels and usually are guarded by their matching severity levels. However,
we do see inconsistencies in trunk. A log statement like
> {code}
> if (LOG.isDebugEnabled()) {
> LOG.info("Assigned container (" + allocated + ") "
> {code}
> doesn't make much sense because the log message is actually only printed out in DEBUG-level.
We do see previous issues tried to correct this inconsistency. I am proposing a comprehensive
correction over trunk.
> Doug Cutting pointed it out in HADOOP-312: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-312?focusedCommentId=12429498&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-12429498
> HDFS-1611 also corrected this inconsistency.
> This could have been avoided by switching from log4j to slf4j's {} format like CASSANDRA-625
(2010/3) and ZOOKEEPER-850 (2012/1), which gives cleaner code and slightly higher performance.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
|