hadoop-mapreduce-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Siddharth Seth (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (MAPREDUCE-4984) AM leaves unwanted node/rack requests after container has been assigned
Date Wed, 06 Feb 2013 23:46:13 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-4984?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13573006#comment-13573006
] 

Siddharth Seth commented on MAPREDUCE-4984:
-------------------------------------------

Sandy, is this a dupe of MAPREDUCE-4671 ?
                
> AM leaves unwanted node/rack requests after container has been assigned
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MAPREDUCE-4984
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-4984
>             Project: Hadoop Map/Reduce
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: applicationmaster, mr-am
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.2-alpha
>            Reporter: Sandy Ryza
>            Assignee: Sandy Ryza
>
> Consider the following situation:
> node1, node2, and node3 are all on rack1
> task1 is submitted with resource requests on node1, node2, rack1, and *
> task2 is submitted with resource requests on node3, rack1, and *
> The RM gives a container to the app on node1, on which the AM assigns task1.  While node1
is removed from the scheduler's bookkeeping, node2 is not, so its delay scheduling will try
as hard to assign a container there is it would to node3.
> The AM should cancel its request for node2 on its next heartbeat by sending a resource
request with # containers = 0.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Mime
View raw message