hadoop-mapreduce-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mayank Bansal (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (MAPREDUCE-4495) Workflow Application Master in YARN
Date Thu, 11 Oct 2012 00:17:03 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-4495?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13473727#comment-13473727
] 

Mayank Bansal commented on MAPREDUCE-4495:
------------------------------------------

Since beginning I was in favor of adding WF DAG to AM and I already shown intrest contributing
to that. I was before in favor of adding this work to MR and YARN but Bobby pointed out correctly
that it would be very difficult for us to keep Oozie and WFAM in sync.

I dont think we should add this WFAM as part of oozie as well because if we do that then all
other projects like PIG and HIVE wants to use it and then it would be a problem for them or
any other future project which wants to use WF functionality.

Ideally it should be a library/project which other projects like Oozie, PIG and HIVE should
depend upon. One can argue that then it should be part of MR and YARN and then every other
project can depends on it, But if we do that, then every new functionality which wants to
implement AM interface has to be part of YARN which does not seems right to me at this point.
I think the basic Idea behind creating AM is that any new application/project can implement
that and use the YARN framework. Its not necessarily means it should be part of YARN framework
itself.

Based on my understanding I think we should create new project and move forward , I am very
much willing to contribute to that. It would be easier for us to innovate and move forward
in separate project then being part of YARN.

Thats just my understanding.

Thoughts?


                
> Workflow Application Master in YARN
> -----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MAPREDUCE-4495
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-4495
>             Project: Hadoop Map/Reduce
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0-alpha
>            Reporter: Bo Wang
>            Assignee: Bo Wang
>         Attachments: MAPREDUCE-4495-v1.1.patch, MAPREDUCE-4495-v1.patch, MapReduceWorkflowAM.pdf
>
>
> It is useful to have a workflow application master, which will be capable of running
a DAG of jobs. The workflow client submits a DAG request to the AM and then the AM will manage
the life cycle of this application in terms of requesting the needed resources from the RM,
and starting, monitoring and retrying the application's individual tasks.
> Compared to running Oozie with the current MapReduce Application Master, these are some
of the advantages:
>  - Less number of consumed resources, since only one application master will be spawned
for the whole workflow.
>  - Reuse of resources, since the same resources can be used by multiple consecutive jobs
in the workflow (no need to request/wait for resources for every individual job from the central
RM).
>  - More optimization opportunities in terms of collective resource requests.
>  - Optimization opportunities in terms of rewriting and composing jobs in the workflow
(e.g. pushing down Mappers).
>  - This Application Master can be reused/extended by higher systems like Pig and hive
to provide an optimized way of running their workflows.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Mime
View raw message