Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-mapreduce-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 48764 invoked from network); 18 Jun 2010 05:45:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 18 Jun 2010 05:45:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 39120 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2010 05:45:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-mapreduce-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39006 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2010 05:45:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact mapreduce-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: mapreduce-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list mapreduce-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38921 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jun 2010 05:45:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 05:45:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1527.5 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,FS_REPLICA X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 05:45:44 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o5I5jO9W021920 for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 05:45:24 GMT Message-ID: <29440437.74251276839924214.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 01:45:24 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: mapreduce-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (MAPREDUCE-1831) Delete the co-located replicas when raiding file In-Reply-To: <11474509.111401275418905110.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-1831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12880073#action_12880073 ] Hadoop QA commented on MAPREDUCE-1831: -------------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12446833/MAPREDUCE-1831.20100610.txt against trunk revision 955543. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 2 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. -1 contrib tests. The patch failed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Mapreduce-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/252/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Mapreduce-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/252/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Mapreduce-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/252/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Mapreduce-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/252/console This message is automatically generated. > Delete the co-located replicas when raiding file > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: MAPREDUCE-1831 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-1831 > Project: Hadoop Map/Reduce > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: contrib/raid > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Scott Chen > Assignee: Scott Chen > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: MAPREDUCE-1831.20100610.txt, MAPREDUCE-1831.txt, MAPREDUCE-1831.v1.1.txt > > > In raid, it is good to have the blocks on the same stripe located on different machine. > This way when one machine is down, it does not broke two blocks on the stripe. > By doing this, we can decrease the block error probability in raid from O(p^3) to O(p^4) which can be a hugh improvement (where p is the replica missing probability). > One way to do this is that we can add a new BlockPlacementPolicy which deletes the replicas that are co-located. > So when raiding the file, we can make the remaining replicas live on different machines. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.