Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-mapreduce-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 35280 invoked from network); 20 May 2010 23:38:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 May 2010 23:38:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 29956 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2010 23:38:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-mapreduce-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29909 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2010 23:38:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact mapreduce-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: mapreduce-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list mapreduce-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29901 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2010 23:38:39 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 May 2010 23:38:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1450.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 May 2010 23:38:39 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o4KNcIMh006030 for ; Thu, 20 May 2010 23:38:18 GMT Message-ID: <28313824.9021274398698589.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 19:38:18 -0400 (EDT) From: "Joydeep Sen Sarma (JIRA)" To: mapreduce-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (MAPREDUCE-1800) using map output fetch failures to blacklist nodes is problematic In-Reply-To: <26464038.18861274292537891.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-1800?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12869811#action_12869811 ] Joydeep Sen Sarma commented on MAPREDUCE-1800: ---------------------------------------------- how would we detect a slow port/nic? (that currently map-fetch failures at network level end up catching) > using map output fetch failures to blacklist nodes is problematic > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: MAPREDUCE-1800 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-1800 > Project: Hadoop Map/Reduce > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Joydeep Sen Sarma > > If a mapper and a reducer cannot communicate, then either party could be at fault. The current hadoop protocol allows reducers to declare nodes running the mapper as being at fault. When sufficient number of reducers do so - then the map node can be blacklisted. > In cases where networking problems cause substantial degradation in communication across sets of nodes - then large number of nodes can become blacklisted as a result of this protocol. The blacklisting is often wrong (reducers on the smaller side of the network partition can collectively cause nodes on the larger network partitioned to be blacklisted) and counterproductive (rerunning maps puts further load on the (already) maxed out network links). > We should revisit how we can better identify nodes with genuine network problems (and what role, if any, map-output fetch failures have in this). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.