hadoop-mapreduce-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hemanth Yamijala (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (MAPREDUCE-1307) Introduce the concept of Job Permissions
Date Sun, 07 Feb 2010 06:48:28 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-1307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12830671#action_12830671
] 

Hemanth Yamijala commented on MAPREDUCE-1307:
---------------------------------------------

For queues, the flexibility of ACLs seems required. Since queues can be setup for solving
different use-cases - for e.g. all small jobs to a queue - one can imagine that an arbitrary
set of users / groups need to be granted access. It is difficult to setup POSIX style permissions
to solve such access requirements. Hence ACLs.

For jobs, I am not that certain if a POSIX model is insufficient. For e.g. would we need arbitrary
user / group access to jobs ? While it seems unlikely, it is equally possible to construct
a use case where this would be useful. For example, say a department in an organization is
submitting jobs to a shared grid. Say the grid already has a group of administrators who manage
all resources of the grid. We probably would want 'write' access to the jobs given to the
grid admins, an operator group of the department, and the job submitter. This seems to imply
different groups would need access to the jobs - something that cannot be setup in a plain
POSIX model.

Given this, I think it may be safer to model job permissions using a flexible ACL model as
for queues. So I am +1 for Vinod's proposal.


> Introduce the concept of Job Permissions
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MAPREDUCE-1307
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-1307
>             Project: Hadoop Map/Reduce
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: security
>            Reporter: Devaraj Das
>             Fix For: 0.22.0
>
>         Attachments: 1307-early-1.patch
>
>
> It would be good to define the notion of job permissions analogous to file permissions.
Then the JobTracker can restrict who can "read" (e.g. look at the job page) or "modify" (e.g.
kill) jobs.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message