hadoop-mapreduce-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Prashant Sharma <prashant.ii...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 0.23 & trunk tars, we'll we publishing 1 tar per component or a single tar? What about source tar?
Date Wed, 12 Oct 2011 16:30:22 GMT
I support the idea of having 4 as additional option.

On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 9:37 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur <tucu@cloudera.com> wrote:
> Currently common, hdfs and mapred create partial tars which are not usable
> unless they are stitched together into a single tar.
>
> With HADOOP-7642 the stitching happens as part of the build.
>
> The build currently produces the following tars:
>
> 1* common TAR
> 2* hdfs (partial) TAR
> 3* mapreduce (partial) TAR
> 4* hadoop (full, the stitched one) TAR
>
> #1 on its own does not run anything, #2 and #3 on their own don't run. #4
> runs hdfs & mapreduce.
>
> Questions:
>
> Q1. Does it make sense to publish #1, #2 & #3? Or #4 is sufficient and you
> start the services you want (i.e. Hbase would just use HDFS)?
>
> Q2. And what about a source TAR, does it make sense to have source TAR per
> component or a single TAR for the whole?
>
>
> For simplicity (for the build system and for users) I'd prefer a single
> binary TAR and a single source TAR.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Alejandro
>



-- 

Prashant Sharma
Pramati Technologies
Begumpet, Hyderabad.

Mime
View raw message