hadoop-mapreduce-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Todd Lipcon <t...@cloudera.com>
Subject Re: MR1 next steps
Date Wed, 13 Jul 2011 15:41:41 GMT
+1 from me as well. Though it will be a bit of a pain for ops upgrading, I
think the pain of maintaining two versions is worse.

-Todd

On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 6:20 AM, Vinod KV <vinodkv@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:

>
> +1 from my side too. Looks like there is overwhelming majority from the dev
> side.
>
> May be we should call for an explicit vote. Making it a vote calls for
> attention from anyone who might've missed this. This thread seems more of a
> proposal.
>
> Thanks,
> +Vinod
>
>
>
>
> On Wednesday 13 July 2011 01:02 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
>
>> On Jul 13, 2011, at 12:30 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
>>
>>  On Jul 7, 2011, at 9:58 AM, Eli Collins wrote:
>>>
>>>  I think #2 makes the most sense. From a developer perspective, MR2 is
>>>> good stuff, there's no need for us to maintain two implementations in
>>>> trunk/23 since we're already maintaining MR1 in the current releases.
>>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Anyone feel otherwise?
>>>
>>>  If we reach consensus, I can do this as part of merging MR-279 into
>> trunk - which (see the email I sent out on merging) is a couple of weeks
>> away.
>>
>> thanks,
>> Arun
>>
>
>


-- 
Todd Lipcon
Software Engineer, Cloudera

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message