hadoop-hive-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Edward Capriolo <edlinuxg...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: usage of Review Board
Date Tue, 15 Jun 2010 01:18:42 GMT
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 8:35 PM, Carl Steinbach <carl@cloudera.com> wrote:

> Hi John,
>
> You mentioned to me offline last week about using Review Board for
> > collaborative review of Hive issues, and I noticed that you started with
> one
> > issue already (http://review.hbase.org/r/178/).  Once we've made sure
> it's
> > working smoothly, it would be cool if everyone we can get everyone using
> > this for uniformity.
> >
>
> Right, I was just testing this out to see if it works. I probably should
> have sent a note out to the hive-dev list first.
>
>
> >
> > Is there a way to set Review Board up so that the infrastructure (or at
> > least URL) is associated with Hive instead of HBase?
> >
> >
> I asked Todd Lipcon about this and he said that he can probably set up a
> vhost for Hive, but that will require an address, and it probably won't
> work
> seamlessly, e.g. emails will likely still refer to hbase.org. He suggested
> instead that we rename the server review.cloudera.com (which I don't think
> folks will like), or hadoopreview.org (which won't cover TLPs), or
> apachereview.org (which will probably cause problems with the ASF). Do you
> have any ideas how to solve this problem?
>
> Also, is there any chance that Facebook can host this server? We're
> currently hosting it as an EC2 instance which is kind of expensive.
>
>
>
> > HBase has a note on their wiki about the process they use:
> >
> > http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Hbase/HoThis seems like a good tool.
> wToContribute#Review_Process<http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Hbase/HowToContribute#Review_Process>
> >
> > If we're going to institute usage of Review Board for Hive, let's
> document
> > it here:
> >
> >
> http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Hive/HowToContribute#Contributing_your_work
> >
> >
> Sounds good to me. Should I got ahead and document it now or wait until we
> get the domain name issue resolved?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Carl
>

This seems like a good tool. Couldn't/shouldn't apache host all the
infrastucture?

I am not implying anything shadey is going on or anything :) but
We do not want something like this happening
http://www.osnews.com/comments/21921

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message