hadoop-hive-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ning Zhang (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Assigned: (HIVE-949) Object deepCopy in GroupBy Operator
Date Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:05:39 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-949?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Ning Zhang reassigned HIVE-949:
-------------------------------

    Assignee: He Yongqiang

Yongqiang, could you please take a look at this as we discussed?

> Object deepCopy in GroupBy Operator
> -----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HIVE-949
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-949
>             Project: Hadoop Hive
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Ning Zhang
>            Assignee: He Yongqiang
>
> In GroupByOperator, objects are first deep copied and then check whether or not the object
is in the hash table (in hash-mode aggregation). In fact, object deep copy could be very expensive
(around 5% CPU time). A simple change could be generate the object without deep copy through
ObjectInspector and check its existence in the hash table. If not exists, we call deep copy.


-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message