hadoop-hive-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Fred Oko <f...@hi5.com>
Subject Re: [jira] Commented: (HIVE-126) Don't fetch information on Partitions from HDFS instead of MetaStore
Date Thu, 22 Jan 2009 01:48:22 GMT
Coming into this a tad late but we leveraged the simplicity of the original
state of this code i.e. "// let's trust hdfs partitions for now". Is it
possible to make this configurable? Basically we came up with a design that
treated Hive solely as a post-processing overlay in that we feed data into
HDFS directly but were fine with using the Hive expected partitioning
scheme. We could switch to HIVE-91 but for our current purposes the
integration of Hive into the data load stage presents no value.


On 1/13/09 2:09 AM, "Johan Oskarsson (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org> wrote:

> 
>     [ 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-126?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.
> system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12663286#action_126632
> 86 ] 
> 
> Johan Oskarsson commented on HIVE-126:
> --------------------------------------
> 
> Since HIVE-142 is committed and the code in this ticket has been committed by
> accident, perhaps it's best to just update the CHANGES file with the ticket
> information and close this one?
> 
>> Don't fetch information on Partitions from HDFS instead of MetaStore
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>>                 Key: HIVE-126
>>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-126
>>             Project: Hadoop Hive
>>          Issue Type: Improvement
>>          Components: Metastore
>>            Reporter: Johan Oskarsson
>>            Assignee: Johan Oskarsson
>>             Fix For: 0.2.0
>> 
>>         Attachments: HIVE-126.patch, HIVE-126.patch
>> 
>> 
>> When investigating HIVE-91 an issue came up where the information on what
>> partitions a table contains is loaded by listing the directories in the table
>> directory on HDFS. This is then used to overrule what is in the MetaStore if
>> any difference is found.
>> * Would it not be preferable if MetaStore is the one authority on what the
>> table contains?
>> * It will also be a major hassle (or impossible?) to retrieve this
>> information from HDFS with external tables that have non standard partition
>> names (HIVE-91), such as: table/2008/01/08/portugal where "2008/01/08" is one
>> partition value and "portugal" is another.


Mime
View raw message