Mailing-List: contact user-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@hadoop.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAN0SkmnStrUXwDQzNjvC8gH0QOh7_6eNvUTENRARMpJ+ydMzvg@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <OFE1877893.D8DBE426-ON65257EC7.00503B97-65257EC7.00507C9B@in.ibm.com>
 <CAN0SkmnStrUXwDQzNjvC8gH0QOh7_6eNvUTENRARMpJ+ydMzvg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Corey Nolet <cjnolet@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 13:04:30 -0400
Message-ID: 
 <CAOHP_tF-A-HfYKsRv28rWtgNwCedP6ty3cwPVdNMigTO1qKGhA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Hetergeneous Hadoop Cluster
To: user@hadoop.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b874e50a02a170520813a24

--047d7b874e50a02a170520813a24
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

If the hardware is drastically different, I would think a multi-volume HDFS
instance would be a good idea (put like-hardware in the same volumes).

On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Tushar Kapila <tgkprog@gmail.com> wrote:

> Would only matter if OS specific communication was being used between
> nodes. I assume they do not do that.
> If that is true -> It would depend on the network and each nodes config
> for the work it is doing. Cluster performance would not suffer just because
> it is heterogeneous.
>
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 8:09 PM, Ashish Kumar9 <ashishk4@in.ibm.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi :
>>
>> Has anyone tried a heterogeneous hadoop cluster with management nodes and
>> data nodes running on multiple linux distros. and on multiple h/w
>> architecture .
>>
>> If so , what is the performance of such cluster .
>>
>> Thanks
>> Ashish
>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards
> Tushar Kapila
>

--047d7b874e50a02a170520813a24
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">If the hardware is drastically different, I would think a =
multi-volume HDFS instance would be a good idea (put like-hardware in the s=
ame volumes).<br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_q=
uote">On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Tushar Kapila <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;=
<a href=3D"mailto:tgkprog@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">tgkprog@gmail.com</a=
>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 =
0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr">Woul=
d only matter if OS specific communication was being used between nodes. I =
assume they do not do that.<br>If that is true -&gt; It would depend on the=
 network and each nodes config for the work it is doing. Cluster performanc=
e would not suffer just because it is heterogeneous. <br></div><div class=
=3D"gmail_extra"><div><div class=3D"h5"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On M=
on, Sep 21, 2015 at 8:09 PM, Ashish Kumar9 <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D=
"mailto:ashishk4@in.ibm.com" target=3D"_blank">ashishk4@in.ibm.com</a>&gt;<=
/span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8=
ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><font face=3D"sans-serif" s=
ize=3D"2">Hi :</font>
<br>
<br><font face=3D"sans-serif" size=3D"2">Has anyone tried a heterogeneous h=
adoop
cluster with management nodes and data nodes running on multiple linux
distros. and on multiple h/w architecture .</font>
<br>
<br><font face=3D"sans-serif" size=3D"2">If so , what is the performance of=
 such
cluster .</font>
<br>
<br><font face=3D"sans-serif" size=3D"2">Thanks</font>
<br><span><font color=3D"#888888"><font face=3D"sans-serif" size=3D"2">Ashi=
sh</font></font></span></blockquote></div><br><br clear=3D"all"><br></div><=
/div><span class=3D"HOEnZb"><font color=3D"#888888">-- <br><div>Regards<br>=
Tushar Kapila<br></div>
</font></span></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>

--047d7b874e50a02a170520813a24--