Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EE38C176EE for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 18:13:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 35564 invoked by uid 500); 17 Oct 2014 18:13:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-user-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35383 invoked by uid 500); 17 Oct 2014 18:13:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34878 invoked by uid 99); 17 Oct 2014 18:13:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 18:13:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of kartik.sxn@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.179 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.179] (HELO mail-qc0-f179.google.com) (209.85.216.179) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 18:12:52 +0000 Received: by mail-qc0-f179.google.com with SMTP id x3so982691qcv.38 for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 11:12:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=LNDFexVGDEBKxM74x1qr0+xCY0Sja5taEqLpNcXM8Ds=; b=DoiFbtaHWc7JC+FJDPpu4mLwvWmottBeyoE7uR8iQZq4NkdrTU1ZlAKQ9C5tKvd/jf dIC/4aBRIo2dJK18Rmo72LLuJKrcxGp6oZTwd8Oy3dAgshKIlm+CHHS4uaQ0bvFkPHrm TOq+878TpE+Bx+5qyPH/PUTdSHkRB2UooGoScwOw1Uy3ftPCzqEkYOAItn1BSlhOqtDY S9krJJkewXBKKwqSj/FlB9hTaL0ubuF6IL3CuHprD4tC2xZqJC3w5lk0YIN5ODCUr9qU vm0DLQKdrut8cqWFtJGbZypi/uyEJBoNCfmi3EjOJN+XH16dZX9Yl29ZG8I2+Dh1pzK2 iI1Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.79.79 with SMTP id o15mr14289896qak.93.1413569571220; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 11:12:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.96.67.133 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 11:12:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 11:12:51 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Spark vs Tez From: kartik saxena To: user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bdc78f82875820505a250ac X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --047d7bdc78f82875820505a250ac Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I did a performance benchmark during my summer internship . I am currently a grad student. Can't reveal much about the specific project but Spark is still faster than around 4-5th iteration of Tez of the same query/dataset. By Iteration I mean utilizing the "hot-container" property of Apache Tez . See latest release of Tez and some hortonworks tutorials on their website. The only problem with Spark adoption is the steep learning curve of Scala , and understanding the API properly. Thanks On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Adaryl "Bob" Wakefield, MBA < adaryl.wakefield@hotmail.com> wrote: > Does anybody have any performance figures on how Spark stacks up > against Tez? If you don=E2=80=99t have figures, does anybody have an opin= ion? Spark > seems so popular but I=E2=80=99m not really seeing why. > B. > --047d7bdc78f82875820505a250ac Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I did a performance benchmark during my summer internship = . I am currently a grad student. Can't reveal much about the specific p= roject but Spark is still faster than around 4-5th iteration of Tez of the = same query/dataset. By Iteration I mean utilizing the "hot-container&q= uot; property of Apache Tez =C2=A0. See latest release of Tez and some hort= onworks tutorials on their website.=C2=A0

The only probl= em with Spark adoption is the steep learning curve of Scala , and understan= ding the API properly.=C2=A0

Thanks

On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 11:06 = AM, Adaryl "Bob" Wakefield, MBA <adaryl.wakefield@hot= mail.com> wrote:
Does anybody have any performance figures on how Spark stacks up again= st=20 Tez? If you don=E2=80=99t have figures, does anybody have an opinion? Spark= seems so=20 popular but I=E2=80=99m not really seeing why.
=
B.

--047d7bdc78f82875820505a250ac--