Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 41C2A100C0 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 11:54:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85044 invoked by uid 500); 7 Feb 2014 11:54:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-user-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84183 invoked by uid 500); 7 Feb 2014 11:54:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84164 invoked by uid 99); 7 Feb 2014 11:54:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 11:54:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of write2kishore@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.177 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.177] (HELO mail-qc0-f177.google.com) (209.85.216.177) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 11:54:34 +0000 Received: by mail-qc0-f177.google.com with SMTP id i8so5574444qcq.22 for ; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 03:54:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=nSMDZHaj3civZtISpLPzK9jHb16lDi9Ca33DGAje8Ws=; b=HcGE5+G1mgoO/hS55+BRbTSbT4YVbWKWT5qcfwc+YX9OUEjSZt0kqCxGusNSHGmH+W tWcFZXtUMOHJ5gcXbQrltqgdc0bUsjqRl/OBSsqb7oyDuVWFvHZB4kIy28ZB8O4Bt0vr NY10hG/4h7+PSsgrp9vzRuFH5nfBgGxZ6MCENBh6mvbuSP6mdxKCElRluS78ozyUH8gb 8NnslFovBJ9E8xBeoMO7Cv90tUcr3iP2JD+sY5lzAxyffPb089WkwwUEg2sfs/I6y5iQ UBGZEH+nWy1Czz1kNjJkZJrs+GHl3+0oLDI37AfPy2o+hoNa+iY3LzzZVdJ8h7DbB8LG f3fA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.83.212 with SMTP id j78mr19756392qgd.42.1391774053353; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 03:54:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.96.97.66 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 03:54:13 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 17:24:13 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Can we avoid restarting of AM when it fails? From: Krishna Kishore Bonagiri To: user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c124a00ed38c04f1cfa6f9 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a11c124a00ed38c04f1cfa6f9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, I am having some failure test cases where my Application Master is supposed to fail. But when it fails it is again started with _02 . Is there a way for me to avoid the second instance of the Application Master getting started? Is it re-started automatically by the RM after the first one failed? Thanks, Kishore --001a11c124a00ed38c04f1cfa6f9 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,

=A0 =A0I am having some failure test case= s where my Application Master is supposed to fail. But when it fails it is = again started with <appID>_02 . Is there a way for me to avoid the se= cond instance of the Application Master getting started? Is it re-started a= utomatically by the RM after the first one failed?

Thanks,
Kishore
--001a11c124a00ed38c04f1cfa6f9--