Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1A0AB10210 for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 10:10:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 60613 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2013 10:10:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-user-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60440 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2013 10:10:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60430 invoked by uid 99); 8 Nov 2013 10:10:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 10:10:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of unmeshabiju@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.54 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.54] (HELO mail-vb0-f54.google.com) (209.85.212.54) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 10:10:32 +0000 Received: by mail-vb0-f54.google.com with SMTP id q12so1245527vbe.13 for ; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 02:10:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=5Jub1i+/qLuwLyC507krUIrOkpk3zICNv832tGkZviA=; b=wRJbO7eRam1OIC3ct7QahFoldmHQSous73QZln3XqH5gVZlLd10pvVX03N094qb66e 75Y8BPjFenflIPJARyLZpOKebrwA/A0lPTne0+NQ0LU8MMNXxp3NqTf5lF3bWzD15S0t SsYOHLDRVukr3ykU94k930vg5rauHhcS3jqYIVrfplsRToYGu96mjeFibsnZAhEvbNxz IqHkLtJlOZ9yM2AVkMSGvCaQ0UolZXSPsbrt/ci6IXW8VrXTALjszSO33jmLPih37/IE 4qKlmB9z0rffE1KX8ykqgRGO5qwy9x06Ej3xX7f4mXuze6jYzz2rJ4/7SJ2sjsfhIDJ1 fyfw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.230.102 with SMTP id sx6mr9342971vdc.15.1383905411592; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 02:10:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.59.8.2 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 02:10:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 15:40:11 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: SVM implementaion From: unmesha sreeveni To: User Hadoop Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0111ae3475f6c104eaa79655 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --089e0111ae3475f6c104eaa79655 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable where can i get a large file for checking svm .with classes 1 and -1 around 1 GB file On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 11:14 AM, unmesha sreeveni wr= ote: > thx Mirko Kampf > > > On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Mirko K=E4mpf wr= ote: > >> There are three Jira issues about it: Mahout-14 >> and Mahout-334 have >> been closed as won't fix. Mahout-232 was >> assigned later because some code was contributed early (2009) but it did >> not work so it was not incorporated into Mahout. Since then Mahout has >> changed, so porting the code would be difficult, and if you look at the >> issue there is some disagreement about whether it approaches the problem= in >> the best way. >> >> There is some code for a cascadeSVM implementation but >> the training part - the hard part - was never published. >> >> There is a parallel SVM implementation = that >> runs on MPI rather than Hadoop. >> >> This San Francisco Meetup abstract has >> some discussion of current state of the art and issues for parallel SVM. >> >> >> >> >> >> 2013/11/8 unmesha sreeveni >> >>> Do we have an SVM implementation? >>> >>> -- >>> *Thanks & Regards* >>> >>> Unmesha Sreeveni U.B >>> >>> *Junior Developer* >>> >>> *Amrita Center For Cyber Security * >>> >>> >>> * Amritapuri.www.amrita.edu/cyber/ * >>> >> >> > > > -- > *Thanks & Regards* > > Unmesha Sreeveni U.B > > *Junior Developer* > > *Amrita Center For Cyber Security * > > > * Amritapuri.www.amrita.edu/cyber/ * > --=20 *Thanks & Regards* Unmesha Sreeveni U.B *Junior Developer* *Amrita Center For Cyber Security* * Amritapuri.www.amrita.edu/cyber/ * --089e0111ae3475f6c104eaa79655 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
where can i get a large file for checking svm .with classes 1 a= nd -1
around 1 GB file


On Fri,= Nov 8, 2013 at 11:14 AM, unmesha sreeveni <unmeshabiju@gmail.com&= gt; wrote:
thx Mirko Kampf


On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Mirko K=E4mpf <<= a href=3D"mailto:mirko.kaempf@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">mirko.kaempf@gma= il.com> wrote:

There are three Jira issues about it:=A0Mahout-14=A0and=A0Mahout-334=A0have been closed as won't fix.=A0Ma= hout-232=A0was assigned later because some code was contributed early (= 2009) but it did not work so it was not incorporated into Mahout. Since the= n Mahout has changed, so porting the code would be difficult, and if you lo= ok at the issue there is some disagreement about whether it approaches the = problem in the best way.

There is=A0some code for a cascadeSVM implementation=A0but the trainin= g part - the hard part - was never published.

There is a=A0parallel SVM implementation=A0that runs on MPI rather than Hadoo= p.

This San Francisco Meetup abstract=A0has some dis= cussion of current state of the art and issues for parallel SVM.





2013/11/8 unmesha sreeveni <unmeshabiju@gmail.com>
Do we have an SVM implementation?

--
Thanks & Regards

Unmesha Sreeveni U.B
Junior Developer
Amrita Center For Cyber Security




--
=
Thanks & Regards

Unmesha Sreeveni U.B
Junior Developer
Amrita Center For Cyber Security



--
=
Thanks & Regards

Unmesha Sreeveni U.B
Junior Developer
Amrita Center For Cyber Security
--089e0111ae3475f6c104eaa79655--