Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7E7ED1080B for ; Sat, 14 Sep 2013 10:45:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 66514 invoked by uid 500); 14 Sep 2013 10:45:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-user-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66404 invoked by uid 500); 14 Sep 2013 10:45:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66394 invoked by uid 99); 14 Sep 2013 10:45:23 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 Sep 2013 10:45:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of harsh@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.179 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.179] (HELO mail-ob0-f179.google.com) (209.85.214.179) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 Sep 2013 10:44:45 +0000 Received: by mail-ob0-f179.google.com with SMTP id wn1so2021819obc.10 for ; Sat, 14 Sep 2013 03:44:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0PpIuoLjJ1glXyiraxqUaUAiZ8VGKFR5Gt8Y2ddheok=; b=V3hENMvAKFWViFEY7ENSHXrr8FircuEqsg/CHo2uEHXIZYzJOFfKuG+3O7EnJUtj9e Qh+6xErZuF1Da5toFEoz5iG1+dm6m/Q3S+9Neg/jesleOPI5Z3QIxuVjtZYb5jvW7il+ PQxFVHcu4unjkndso9ohSe4idLohyXDMW7Ar/mZJlX5vg+Grr0T+GlFI4F9s5b++KarW M809VoxA6xIO0XwpbgyucYv8lj+bwtpKxZ2Rhfijz6prmDFmf1oeXVb0umHTude7Caqz 2bMbXsElLyMiRY/ilEeJS8YukDlWvRzpv9XRmIxcZwAzzWByLg7UgN/OyVU2Z6cGnJhg R8ZQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnewhVWnlMYOSyltJA7mdsUv3WGtaXbFAfde9V1XjMQlM2g+rJk45vjHifzKA5uwhGJ2O4o X-Received: by 10.182.73.136 with SMTP id l8mr685904obv.53.1379155464576; Sat, 14 Sep 2013 03:44:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.95.105 with HTTP; Sat, 14 Sep 2013 03:44:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <2013091315575845477867@qunar.com> References: <2013090910412309302332@qunar.com> <2013091315575845477867@qunar.com> From: Harsh J Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2013 16:14:03 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FATAL org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JettyBugMonitor question To: "" , user6d6b4dda Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org What version of jetty are you using? We've not seen this lately (after we began shipping a patched Jetty), but the check is valid and protects your MR jobs from getting into a hung or slow state. On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 1:26 PM, =C2=F3=CA=F7=C8=D9 = wrote: > No one gives me help ? > > ________________________________ > =C2=F3=CA=F7=C8=D9 > > From: =C2=F3=CA=F7=C8=D9 > Date: 2013-09-09 10:39 > To: user@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: FATAL org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JettyBugMonitor question > hi=A3=AC > > Recently=A3=ACI encounter =A1=B0FATAL org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JettyBugM= onitor > =A3=ACtasktracker shut down=A1=B1problem in some hadoop computers. The lo= g information > is as follows: > 2013-09-02 19:33:53,015 FATAL org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JettyBugMonitor: > ************************************************************ > Jetty CPU usage: 120.6%. This is greater than the fatal threshold > mapred.tasktracker.jetty.cpu.threshold.fatal. Aborting JVM. > > After google, I find the following relative information: > The TaskTracker now has a thread which monitors for a known Jetty bug in > which the selector thread starts spinning and map output can no longer be > served. If the bug is detected, the TaskTracker will shut itself down. Th= is > feature can be disabled by setting > mapred.tasktracker.jetty.cpu.check.enabled to false. > > How do you solve the problem usually ? Is there a simple method to deal w= ith > the problem ? > Thanks. --=20 Harsh J