Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CC7A6D43A for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 19:01:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 12613 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2013 19:01:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-user-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12410 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2013 19:01:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12399 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2013 19:01:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 19:01:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of airbots@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.175] (HELO mail-vc0-f175.google.com) (209.85.220.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 19:01:29 +0000 Received: by mail-vc0-f175.google.com with SMTP id fw7so3796377vcb.34 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 11:01:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=PBBAeeACvMW0LOImdsQvAnrRAVDFV6MyOELZ0BLJEcQ=; b=s7uvzHaiz0OWJuE4uikeQ67dBPkQzGbUAIOJLmvZI+PveUUf/IYSJmlF7M2psNj03A B4sE2uHUGX8Fqg5Ac6hVkfYQPDaDWS7J4g8fWhtF1CGC4xq+dhJlaDOPplhygptifY8L HiEk1GgCnRQ30IASHTbv+Q6FW78zeqPsXLH7e1oJAU/8VrTdpe+iJn0berZs4VsY/dFh Qs4o3RayCD2RNXVFQaT9gDYMgka7LrVmhqVpSjMS/QzUBkc6osxL8Z94b6+Yv//w7tQK 0zLsuIzfblElqbdTYKAks7Ec+amktBl1QPx1M4Pia06vttFHlBOtXr2VEQolD+pN/Bi5 dqEg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.31.36 with SMTP id x4mr14155339vdh.44.1361214064659; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 11:01:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.58.117.162 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 11:01:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 13:01:04 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Using NFS mounted volume for Hadoop installation/configuration From: Chen He To: user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec51d284cc98c5d04d604589c X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --bcaec51d284cc98c5d04d604589c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cloudera manager or Zettaset can be a choice if you like easy configuration. This type of software will do the rysnc for you. On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Mehmet Belgin < mehmet.belgin@oit.gatech.edu> wrote: > It looks like the NFS stability and performance are two main concerns. > Since my cluster is still experimental, I will continue to use NFS for now. > In the future, when we have a larger production cluster, I will consider > local configurations. > > Thank you all for your replies! > > -Mehmet > > > > On Feb 18, 2013, at 1:00 PM, Mehmet Belgin wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > Will it be any problem if I put the hadoop executables and configuration > on a NFS volume, which is shared by all masters and slaves? This way the > configuration changes will be available for all nodes, without need for > synching any files. While this looks almost like a no-brainer, I am > wondering if there are any pitfalls I need to be aware of. > > On a related question, is there a best practices (do's and don'ts ) > document that you can suggest other than the regular documentation by > Apache? > > Thanks! > -Mehmet > > > --bcaec51d284cc98c5d04d604589c Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cloudera manager or Zettaset can be a choice if you like easy configuration= . This type of software will do the rysnc for you.

On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Mehmet Belgin <mehm= et.belgin@oit.gatech.edu> wrote:
It = looks like the NFS stability and performance are two main concerns. Since m= y cluster is still experimental, I will continue to use NFS for now. In the= future, when we have a larger production cluster, I will consider local co= nfigurations.

Thank you all for your replies!

-Mehmet
=



On Feb 18, 2013, at 1:00 PM, Mehmet Belgin wrote:

Hi Everyone,

Will it be any problem if = I put the hadoop executables and configuration on a NFS volume, which is sh= ared by all masters and slaves? This way the configuration changes will be = available for all nodes, without need for synching any files. While this lo= oks almost like a no-brainer, I am wondering if there are any pitfalls I ne= ed to be aware of.

On a related question, is there a best practices (do's and don'= ts ) document that you can suggest other than the regular documentation by = Apache?

Thanks!
-Mehmet


--bcaec51d284cc98c5d04d604589c--