Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0DD80D780 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 12:58:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 14258 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jan 2013 12:58:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-hdfs-user-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14120 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jan 2013 12:58:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14107 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jan 2013 12:58:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 12:58:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gmazza@talend.com designates 64.95.72.243 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.95.72.243] (HELO mxout.myoutlookonline.com) (64.95.72.243) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 12:58:44 +0000 Received: from mxout.myoutlookonline.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mxout.myoutlookonline.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 998738BF0DE for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 07:58:23 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: by SpamTitan at mail.lan Received: from S10HUB002.SH10.lan (unknown [10.110.2.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mxout.myoutlookonline.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 093948BF110 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 07:58:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from S10HUBR001.SH10.lan (10.110.133.100) by S10HUB002.SH10.lan (10.110.133.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.438.0; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 07:58:22 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.47] (74.96.49.22) by mail10.myoutlookonline.com (10.110.133.100) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.438.0; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 07:58:16 -0500 Message-ID: <50E6D1E8.1070601@talend.com> Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 07:58:16 -0500 From: Glen Mazza User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Subject: Re: Instructions on how to run Apache Hadoop 2.0.2-alpha? References: <50B91902.3050504@talend.com> <927002426C51024987B870FBB0F63BC4478D5391@CH1PRD0202MB112.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <50E6C0F1.9060705@talend.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090905000307090801060008" X-Originating-IP: [74.96.49.22] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --------------090905000307090801060008 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Thanks for your response. That's pretty vital information--I'm not used to separate development/publication versions. Is the 0.23-->2.0.2 renumbering stated anywhere on the Hadoop website or wiki? It's very confusing as people otherwise think there are three separate branches -- 0.2x.y, 1.x, and 2.x when there are really just two. Also the releases page: http://hadoop.apache.org/releases.html mentions *both* 0.23.x and 2.0.2 releases -- wouldn't the former be numbered as the latter, if as you're saying, 0.23 is published as 2.0.x? Thanks, Glen On 01/04/2013 07:02 AM, Chen He wrote: > 0.24 is the developing version, 2.0.2 is the publication version. > > 0.23 or above is published as 2.0.x > > On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 5:45 AM, Glen Mazza > wrote: > > Actually, those instructions are for Hadoop 0.24, not 2.0.2-alpha. > > Glen > > > On 11/30/2012 03:40 PM, Cristian Cira wrote: > > Dear Glen, > > try > http://blog.cloudera.com/blog/2011/11/building-and-deploying-mr2/ > > Cristian Cira > Graduate Research Assistant > Parallel Architecture and System Laboratory(PASL) > Shelby Center 2105 > Auburn University, AL 36849 > > ________________________________________ > From: Glen Mazza [gmazza@talend.com ] > Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 2:37 PM > To: user@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: Instructions on how to run Apache Hadoop 2.0.2-alpha? > > Hi, I was able to run Hadoop 1.0.4 single-node with no > difficulty following these instructions: > http://hadoop.apache.org/docs/stable/single_node_setup.html . > > The corresponding page that we're referred to at the bottom of > here: http://hadoop.apache.org/docs/current/ for Hadoop 2.0.2 > is radically different, however, it doesn't seem to have > anything to do with starting Hadoop: > http://hadoop.apache.org/docs/current/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-site/SingleCluster.html > . Is it because I'm looking at the wrong page or is it that > Hadoop 2.0.2 is really so different that the instructions have > radically changed? Is there anything similar to > http://hadoop.apache.org/docs/stable/single_node_setup.html > that will show me how to run Hadoop 2.0.2? > > Thanks, > Glen > > -- > Glen Mazza > Talend Community Coders - coders.talend.com > > blog: www.jroller.com/gmazza > > > > > > -- > Glen Mazza > Talend Community Coders - coders.talend.com > blog: www.jroller.com/gmazza > > -- Glen Mazza Talend Community Coders - coders.talend.com blog: www.jroller.com/gmazza --------------090905000307090801060008 Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Thanks for your response.  That's pretty vital information--I'm not used to separate development/publication versions.  Is the 0.23-->2.0.2 renumbering stated anywhere on the Hadoop website or wiki?  It's very confusing as people otherwise think there are three separate branches -- 0.2x.y, 1.x, and 2.x when there are really just two. 

Also the releases page: http://hadoop.apache.org/releases.html mentions *both* 0.23.x and 2.0.2 releases -- wouldn't the former be numbered as the latter, if as you're saying, 0.23 is published as 2.0.x?

Thanks,
Glen

On 01/04/2013 07:02 AM, Chen He wrote:
0.24 is the developing version, 2.0.2 is the publication version.

0.23 or above is published as 2.0.x

On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 5:45 AM, Glen Mazza <gmazza@talend.com> wrote:
Actually, those instructions are for Hadoop 0.24, not 2.0.2-alpha.

Glen


On 11/30/2012 03:40 PM, Cristian Cira wrote:
Dear Glen,

try http://blog.cloudera.com/blog/2011/11/building-and-deploying-mr2/

Cristian Cira
Graduate Research Assistant
Parallel Architecture and System Laboratory(PASL)
Shelby Center 2105
Auburn University, AL 36849

________________________________________
From: Glen Mazza [gmazza@talend.com]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 2:37 PM
To: user@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: Instructions on how to run Apache Hadoop 2.0.2-alpha?

Hi, I was able to run Hadoop 1.0.4 single-node with no difficulty following these instructions:  http://hadoop.apache.org/docs/stable/single_node_setup.html .

The corresponding page that we're referred to at the bottom of here: http://hadoop.apache.org/docs/current/ for Hadoop 2.0.2 is radically different, however, it doesn't seem to have anything to do with starting Hadoop:  http://hadoop.apache.org/docs/current/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-site/SingleCluster.html .  Is it because I'm looking at the wrong page or is it that Hadoop 2.0.2 is really so different that the instructions have radically changed?  Is there anything similar to http://hadoop.apache.org/docs/stable/single_node_setup.html that will show me how to run Hadoop 2.0.2?

Thanks,
Glen

--
Glen Mazza
Talend Community Coders - coders.talend.com
blog: www.jroller.com/gmazza<http://www.jroller.com/gmazza>




--
Glen Mazza
Talend Community Coders - coders.talend.com
blog: www.jroller.com/gmazza




-- 
Glen Mazza
Talend Community Coders - coders.talend.com
blog: www.jroller.com/gmazza
--------------090905000307090801060008--